logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Recidivism at Rikers Means Returning to a “Culture of Violence”

Rick Cohen
August 25, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

Rikers
CristinaMuraca / Shutterstock.com

August 22, 2014; CBS New York

As the site of one of the very few social impact bond experiments in the U.S., Rikers Island has gotten much positive attention for its commitment to reducing recidivism among released prisoners. The news from Rikers Island this past week seemed to be in strong contrast with the socially positive implications of the Goldman Sachs-supported SIB.

Late last week, the investigations chief at the prison resigned as a result of a U.S. Attorney’s office investigation released earlier in August. The federal report described the jail at Rikers as violent and unsafe, a place where prison guards employ “unnecessary and excessive force” as their “first impulse rather than the last resort.”

The specifics from Rikers and other prisons in New York City are incredibly disturbing. One incident from December 2012 involved two prisoners, aged 20 and 24, being “savagely” beaten while strapped to gurneys. But a “code of silence” among Rikers staffers has meant that few incidents of abuse surfaced before the U.S. Attorney’s investigation. That report found that between January and November of last year, guards beat at least 129 inmates so viciously that the victims needed emergency medical treatment.

The U.S. Attorney’s report also examined conditions in the juvenile facilities at Rikers. In fiscal year 2013 alone, due to violence at the hands of prison guards, there were at least 1,057 injuries among males under the age of 18—but that is probably a significant undercount.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

“Inmates see others being beaten and attacked and are afraid that they will face the same fate,” the report stated. “Simply put, Rikers is a dangerous place for adolescents and a pervasive climate of fear exists.”

Despite the federal report and the resignation of the Rikers investigations chief, the Bronx D.A. has decided not to pursue criminal charges against the guards who beat the two inmates to death.

Newsday describes Rikers as “the world’s largest penal colony,” befitting the U.S. Attorney’s characterization of Rikers as plagued by a “deep-seated culture of violence.” There is no question that Rikers as currently run by the authorities is an awful, brutal place. It would be difficult to imagine prisoners wanting to do anything that would bring them back to face the kinds of violence waiting for them in that place.

As Julian Adler, the project director of New York City’s Center for Court Innovation who oversees the Brooklyn Justice Initiatives program, observes, reducing the “mass incarceration” that envelops so many young people and reducing recidivism would be positive steps to take against poverty. Former Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum believes that reducing recidivism is the biggest problem to be addressed at prison hellholes like Rikers, but others believe that a major part of the prison problem is that this nation puts too many people into prison in the first place, including mandatory sentences for drug use that have led to the disproportionate incarceration of African-Americans.

Adler notes that six out of ten people in U.S. jails have not been convicted of any crimes. They have simply been arrested, and many would be eligible for release except they cannot afford to post bail. Moreover, Adler says, three out of four cases that go to trial in New York are for misdemeanors. This puts people into prison who would be better served by programs like the Brooklyn Justice Initiatives, which offer pre-trial supervised release programs for persons with pending misdemeanor cases and community service alternatives to persons who have pled guilty to misdemeanors.

There is nothing wrong with programs that aim to reduce recidivism rates for persons who are leaving jail, though the Goldman Sachs SIB is troubling in a number of ways that we have discussed in the Nonprofit Quarterly before, such as the massive return all but promised to Goldman, but the fundamental problem is that in this country we incarcerate far too many people, we offer far too little in the way of alternatives to jail, we manage to imprison a disproportionate number of persons of color, and, in New York, we send them places of legal torment and agony like Rikers.—Rick Cohen

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Rick Cohen

Rick joined NPQ in 2006, after almost eight years as the executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Before that he played various roles as a community worker and advisor to others doing community work. He also worked in government. Cohen pursued investigative and analytical articles, advocated for increased philanthropic giving and access for disenfranchised constituencies, and promoted increased philanthropic and nonprofit accountability.

More about: InequalityMental HealthNonprofit NewsPolicies and LawsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

NPQ_Winter_2022Subscribe Today
You might also like
Linking Our Fights to Win: On Combatting Elite Capture
Kitana Ananda and Olúfemi O. Táíwò
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
Black Women’s Pay Inequity Starts in the School System
Toni A. Wilson
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan

Popular Webinars

Remaking the Economy

Black Food Sovereignty, Community Stories

Register Now

Combating Disinformation and Misinformation in 21st-Century Social Movements

Register Now

Remaking the Economy

Closing the Racial Wealth Gap

Register Now
You might also like
Linking Our Fights to Win: On Combatting Elite Capture
Kitana Ananda and Olúfemi O. Táíwò
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.