logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Renewed Attempt to Curtail Johnson Amendment Passes US House

Michael Wyland and Ruth McCambridge
July 20, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
By Beyond My Ken [GFDL or CC BY-SA 4.0 ], from Wikimedia Commons

July 19, 2018; Politico

Editor’s Note: Senators need to hear from every person concerned for nonprofits, house of worships, and foundations in their states, as well as all who believe organizations have greater impact when they remain nonpartisan. Go to this Take Action page of the nonprofit coalition (www.GiveVoice.org) to learn what you can do right now to protect nonprofit nonpartisanship.


This week, the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 6147, the “Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2019,” more commonly referred to as a “minibus” (as opposed to omnibus) spending bill. The House passage of this bill, coupled with the US Treasury Department’s announcement on Monday evening that the IRS will stop collecting donor information from tax-exempt organizations that are not charities, has once again raised alarm bells among those who believe in the nonpartisan nature of charitable activity as well as the importance of donor disclosure for all tax-exempt organizations, regardless of the type of IRS exemption they have received.

Section 112 of the bill curtails the IRS’s ability to revoke the tax exemption of churches that engage in political campaigns. The relevant paragraph reads as follows:

None of the funds made available by this Act may be used by the Internal Revenue Service to deny tax exemption under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to a church, an integrated auxiliary of a church, or a convention or association of churches for participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office unless—

(1) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determines that the exemption should be denied;

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

(2) not later than 30 days after such determination, the Commissioner notifies the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate of such determination; and

(3) such denial is effective not earlier than 90 days after the date of the notification under paragraph (2).

As NPQ reported, the same basic language was used in last year’s financial services appropriations bill. However, the provision was stripped from the Senate version of the bill after intense lobbying by a coalition of faith-based and secular nonprofit organizations and associations. But the House is persisting in its desire to repeal and/or constrain the Johnson Amendment.

NPQ has taken a stand against repealing or weakening the Johnson Amendment, which has been part of the federal tax code since 1954. The National Council of Nonprofits (NCN) reports more than 5,800 signers of a “Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship” as well as support for the Johnson Amendment from more than 4,500 faith leaders and over 100 religious and denomination organizations. Focusing specifically on 501c4 social welfare groups often referred to as “dark money” groups, CEO Tim Delaney tied the appropriations bill and Treasury regulations change together and said in a statement that “It’s now impossible for Congress and the White House to deny their objective: to politicize the trusted charitable nonprofit community by authorizing unlimited, unfettered, and untraceable political money to flow through the nonprofit sector to benefit partisan special interests.”

Expect NCN and other advocates for the Johnson Amendment to make their voices heard as the spending bill progresses through Congress.—Michael Wyland and Ruth McCambridge

This article has been altered from its initial form.

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the authors
Michael Wyland

Michael L. Wyland currently serves as an editorial advisory board member and consulting editor to The Nonprofit Quarterly, with more than 400 articles published since 2012. A partner in the consulting firm of Sumption & Wyland, he has more than thirty years of experience in corporate and government public policy, management, and administration.

Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: donor disclosureLegislationNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
The Nonprofit Sector and Social Change: A Conversation between Cyndi Suarez and Claire Dunning
Claire Dunning and Cyndi Suarez
Nonprofits as Battlegrounds for Democracy
Cyndi Suarez
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
The book "Nonprofit Neighborhoods" leaning against a wall
The Nonprofit Sector and Social Change: A Conversation...
Claire Dunning and Cyndi Suarez
Nonprofits as Battlegrounds for Democracy
Cyndi Suarez
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.