logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Self-dealing on J Street?

Rick Cohen
January 11, 2011

December 30, 2010; Source: Washington Times | The question of whether and how to do business with firms associated with board members is one of those recurring topics among nonprofits. Some say the practice should be avoided at all costs but most agree that formal procedures should be sparked at the point that any question arises – and that these procedures should include disclosure, recusal, and bidding.

These procedures are as much to protect the group from accusations as they are to protect donors from self dealing trustees. This recent story from the Washington Times is a case in point. NPQ has no idea if there was any wrong doing in this situation but the Times recently published information purporting to show that J Street, the lobby group, paid more than $56,000 to a public relations consulting firm, Ben-Or Consulting, founded and partially owned by J Street’s founder and president, Jeremy Ben-Ami.

J Street is a 501(c)(4) promoting peace in the Middle East based on support for Israel but with a commitment to a two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians.

Interviewed by the Times, Charity Navigator president Ken Berger described the possible self-dealing as “very messy . . . even if it’s technically legal.” Berger advised, “If you want your organization to use a particular company, ideally there would be a clean break one way or the other . . . so that there would be no question as to what’s going on in the boardroom.”

James Abruzzo of the Institute for Ethical Leadership at Rutgers University said that Ben-Ami should have disclosed his ownership stake in the company and recused himself from any J Street decisions involving the firm and, indeed, there is no evidence in the article that he did or did not do so.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

On J Street’s very large advisory committee are some prominent U.S. nonprofit leaders — Diana Aviv (CEO of Independent Sector), Daniel Bader (president of the Helen Bader Foundation in Milwaukee), Patricia Bauman (Bauman Foundation in DC), David Cohen (co-founder of the Advocacy Institute, former executive director of Common Cause), Peter Edelman (board chair of the New Israel Fund), and Stan Katz (Princeton University), among others.

It is a solidly liberal if not politically progressive cast, quite different from the much larger and better-known pro-Israel lobby, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Ben-Ami’s position is that he left the PR firm in 2000, has no management role in it, and gets no compensation from it, though he may, according to a statement from Ben-Or, still get dividends from his 15 percent ownership stake if the firm is sold. Because J Street has received funding from George Soros, conservative critics of the dovish J Street will be eager to find the soft ethical underbelly of an organization that sees the rights of Palestinians to a two state solution as key to long term success.

Without seeing the documents that the Times possesses, all we can say is that, whether for a lot of money or an inconsequential sum, the appearance and the reality of self-dealing are best avoided by nonprofits. —Rick Cohen

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Rick Cohen

Rick joined NPQ in 2006, after almost eight years as the executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Before that he played various roles as a community worker and advisor to others doing community work. He also worked in government. Cohen pursued investigative and analytical articles, advocated for increased philanthropic giving and access for disenfranchised constituencies, and promoted increased philanthropic and nonprofit accountability.

More about: Nonprofit News
See comments

You might also like
Palestine at the Center: Donor Organizing as Movement Work
Deborah Sagner
From Minneapolis to Portland: State Violence and How Communities Are Responding
Shannon Hiller, Amy Herzfeld-Copple and Aron Goldman
The Trans Athletes at the Center of Supreme Court Cases Don’t Fit Conservative Stereotypes
Kate Sosin
Holding the Line Together: Civil Society and the First Year of the Trump Administration
Genevieve Nadeau and Ellinor Heywood
S.O.S.—Nonprofits Need Funding for “Staff Operating Support”
Rusty Stahl
Environmental Advocates Confront Trump’s Fossil Fuel Agenda
María Constanza Costa

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks into a microphone in front of a sign reading "We are the Supermajority" while an audience listens.
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is...
Jennifer Gerson
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.