logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Fund Development
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Webinars
    • Leading Edge Membership
    • Sponsored Webinars
    • Economic Justice
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
990 forms, Colleges & Universities, Executive Compensation, Form 990s, New York, New York City

State University of New York’s Foundations Make Serious Missteps

Marian Conway
March 13, 2018
Share12
Tweet7
Share
Email
19 Shares

March 7, 2018; Stony Brook Statesman

A comprehensive audit, covering July 1, 2013, to October 12, 2017, of the foundations that support the different state-run colleges and universities of the State Universities of New York (SUNY) found conflicts, breaks in fiscal control, and a lack of governance.

Of the 30 foundations, ten were found deficient, with such issues as expired contracts between campuses and their foundation that include student fees, expenses that were not consistent with the foundations’ missions (like retirement parties and travel expenses without documentation), and foundations not routinely sharing their 990s with the Office of the University Auditor. Two of the foundations were found to have more serious problems.

Arguably, however, the worst part was the fact that the foundations were delinquent in providing information for the actual audit. From the draft audit report’s Comment 1: “We experienced significant delays on this audit. From the onset, foundations were hesitant to provide information. Certain requested information was not provided while other information took an inordinate amount of time to receive.”

There is no excuse for not providing information. The private foundations work with public entities and have donated dollars from foundations, corporations, individuals such as alumni, parents, faculty, and staff, and the government—all of which have the right to the information. When foundations are not forthcoming, they imply they have something to hide from their donors.

From a series of articles presented a few years ago in a collaboration between the Nonprofit Quarterly and the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) comes this sentence which, colorfully, covers the transparency policies that foundations should adopt: “Those who give away large sums must get on board the transparency train or expect to get run over by it.” It appears some SUNY linked foundations have been hit by that train.

The two with more serious conflicts are the Buffalo State College Foundation, Inc. (UBF) and Stony Brook Foundation, Inc. (SBF). UBF had several expenses that did not follow mission or possible donors’ intent. Both foundations were lacking policy guidelines for the procurement of contracts, which leaves the door open to hiring vendors based on who they know and referrals rather than a proposal/bid process. Stony Brook University President Samuel L. Stanley, Jr., disagrees with this finding: “The Stony Brook Foundation does competitive bidding for most of the contracts it has because they do want to get the best value.”

SBF has loans from the foundation to individuals. Housing loans of $300,000 each were provided for the executive director of the SBF and the Provost/Senior Vice President of Stony Brook University. They were not required to pay them back, and an additional $455,664 for the taxes on the loans was absorbed by the foundation.

[President Stanley] called the audit a “non-issue” at a University Senate meeting on Monday, March 5th.

“I think a careful review shows that there was really nothing there,” he said, adding that the Foundation conducts its own internal audits every year through financial advisory service Grant Thornton LLP.

The housing loans are considered part of the package to attract talent to those positions. Individuals must remain in the job for five years to receive the full amount. “One of the biggest challenges we have is recruiting outstanding people to Stony Brook,” said Stanley. “It’s a tremendous advantage if the Foundation can help kick in sometimes to do this.”

A 2014–2015 audit report by Grant Thornton reported outstanding employee loans of $180,000 and $900,000.

The state comptroller’s audit found that the SBF did not report on a conflict of interest statement that there was a relationship between a board member on the investment committee and the firm that provided the investment services. According to N.Y. Newsday,

An official in DiNapoli’s office confirmed [on Tuesday, February 27, 2018] the board member was billionaire James H. Simons and the firm was Renaissance Technologies, based in East Setauket. Simons declined to comment on the matter Tuesday, his spokeswoman said.

NPQ earlier this year addressed the dangers of recruiting board members specifically for the money they provide. Dancing to the donor’s tune is a serious issue, a generous donor should be honored while balancing the mission of the organization and the fiscal governance.

The audit has been contested by the SUNY Chancellor’s office:

In an email Tuesday night, the SUNY chancellor’s office said: “We strongly reject the assertions made by the Comptroller in this ‘audit.’ SUNY maintains very tight financial controls over its affiliated foundations, which operate through philanthropic donations and do not contain any public funds, and provide additional financial support to the important academic mission of the institutions. These controls include annual independent audits, strict expenditure polices and oversight. They also include contracts between the campuses and their respective foundations, which are a function of SUNY policy, and are not required by law. SUNY recently updated these contracts to comply with enhanced foundation guidelines adopted by the Board of Trustees in May 2016, a process that began well before the onset of the Office of the State Comptroller’s audit. Those contracts are now finalized for almost all campuses. This audit report simply ignores the facts, which are readily verifiable.”

Richard Nasti, a Stony Brook Foundation board member, said he was “very, very disappointed” and believed that commentary by the auditors of Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli’s was an “overreach.” Nasti said, “This particular audit went far beyond the scope of what it should have been.”

The challenge comes down to requiring board members to bring six-figure donations to the table, and staff to fundraise those dollars, which leaves little room for the professional foundation people who are committed to the governance and crossing every regulation “t,” and potential board members who are not necessarily wealthy but are well acquainted with those rules and operating nonprofits.—Marian Conway

Disclosure: This author is the chair of the board of SUNY Empire State College Foundation. Empire did not appear in the NYS comptroller’s list of foundations with lapses.

Share12
Tweet7
Share
Email
19 Shares

About The Author
Marian Conway

Marian Conway, the executive director of the NY Community Bank Foundation, has a Masters in Interdisciplinary Studies, Writing and a Ph.D. in Public Policy, Nonprofit Management. She has discovered that her job and education have made her a popular person with nonprofits and a prime candidate for their boards. Marian keeps things in perspective, not allowing all that to go to her head, but it is difficult to say no to a challenge, especially participating in change, in remaking a board. She is currently on eleven boards of various sizes and has learned to say no.

Related
Study Detailing Financial Status of 946 Private Colleges Is Quashed
By Steve Dubb
November 21, 2019
Largest-Ever Gift to a Law School Creates Firestorm at Penn Law
By Ruth McCambridge
November 20, 2019
Is Recent Harvard Admissions Scandal Yet Another Sign of Lax IRS Oversight?
By Martin Levine
November 18, 2019
Not a Good Week for Sanford Health
By Ruth McCambridge
November 14, 2019
Partnerships Help Indian Country Today Bring Native Voices to the Mainstream
By Steve Dubb
November 14, 2019
Lord Foundations Distribute $1 Billion in Four Big Flexible Gifts
By Ruth McCambridge
November 14, 2019
other posts by The Author
California Goes All Out to Boost College Completion Rates
By Marian Conway
December 10, 2019
Harvard-Yale Game Protest Highlights University Investment...
By Marian Conway
December 2, 2019
Coldplay Seeks to Make Its Tours Carbon Neutral
By Marian Conway
November 25, 2019
A Series on Sensemaking Organizations
The Sensemaking Organization: Designing for Complexity
The Sensemaking Mindset: Improvisation over Strategy
Structuring for Sensemaking: The Power of Small Segments
logo
Donate
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletters
  • Write for NPQ
  • Advertise
  • Writers
  • Funders
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe to View Webinars

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by GDPR plugin
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.