logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Grassroots Fundraising Journal
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • About
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Featured Articles
  • Webinars
    • Free Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
New York, New York City, Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOTs)

The Majority of This Town’s Property is Tax-Exempt & Some Residents Call Foul

Larry Kaplan
March 29, 2016
Share28
Share13
Email
Tweet

potsdam-ny

March 27, 2016; Watertown Daily Times (Watertown, NY)

Lately, NPQ has been covering a flurry of stories about the question of nonprofit property tax exemptions. Recent stories involve nonprofit hospitals in New Jersey and Connecticut, as well as the universities of Princeton and Yale. In these cases, among others, lawmakers, the courts, local officials, and the nonprofits themselves are all trying to find some compromise that will meet the needs both of local tax bases and the institutions themselves. But the challenge of nonprofit property tax exemptions is probably no more acute than in tiny Potsdam in upstate New York, near the Canadian border and some 300 miles northwest of New York City. It’s the kind of situation that leads to the creation of PILOTs, or payments in lieu of taxes, common in many cities in the northeast.

“With 69 percent of village properties exempt from property taxes, you could call taxpaying property owners financially burdened,” says the Watertown Daily Times. That would be an understatement.

New York’s state comptroller has called Potsdam the most fiscally stressed village in the state. Taxpayers are not happy about subsidizing the tax-exempt status of local nonprofit institutions, and some businesses say the high property tax assessments are driving them out of town.

“I don’t think it’s fair that the village taxpayers have to pay for everything. There are all these universities and hospitals, and there should be some way they should be able to pony up a little bit,” said one local storeowner.

And when Clarkson University, a prestigious private four-year research university, purchased seven properties in town primarily for student and faculty housing, it only added to the percentage of tax-exempt property in the village, although one of the properties will be taxable because it is being leased to a local startup company.

Some locals believe that village taxes are “running away with themselves,” and are upset that they must pay, while large local universities and hospitals don’t. “Forty to 50 percent [of village residents] pay 100 percent of the taxes.” said one. Some say the situation has become a deterrent to buying in the village.

One local businessman argues that Potsdam’s colleges should pay more in taxes for the property they rent out to students, and that only properties strictly for direct educational purposes should be tax-exempt. This is the kind of reasoning that the judge used in the Morristown Medical Center case. Clarkson University and village officials see things differently, saying that the college’s recent purchases are not significant to the tax rate and will improve the “look and value of those parcels.”

Clarkson argues that residence halls and other on-campus dwellings are part of the college experience. Unless specifically exempted, Clarkson students are required to live on campus for all four of their undergraduate years.

The Daily Times writes that Clarkson’s CFO said “it’s obvious that [the] college…is an institution which contributes ‘a great deal’ to the local economy, and adds to the tax base through properties not directly related to the college’s mission,” referring specifically a for-profit subsidiary of the college which owns an inn and bookstore. The college is also renovating a building that will go on the tax rolls when it is rented out to for-profit tenants.

In 2015, the for-profit enterprises contributed over $200,000 in property taxes to the village, local schools and the county. In addition, Clarkson says it has added “millions” to the local economy through campus jobs aimed at serving students, the commercializing of research, college operations, and construction, and by generating state and local tax revenues.

The college points out that the faculty and staff who live in the village personally contribute to the local tax base, and that it has also supported the village through donations and in-kind engineering expertise for public works projects.

“We’re an economic engine. We’re proud of the fact that we play such a big role in energizing the community,” said Clarkson’s CFO.

Village officials say that Clarkson is cleaning up substandard properties. They say that critics of Clarkson’s recent purchases are not seeing the long view, or the benefits of having the college in town and taking ownership of substandard properties and fixing them up but this situation does raise some interesting questions as our economy changes.—Larry Kaplan

Share28
Share13
Email
Tweet

About The Author
Larry Kaplan

Larry Kaplan is a consultant based in Los Angeles. He describes himself as passionate about urban communities and social justice. He helps non-profit organizations leverage governmental and community relations to advocate for their causes, advance their missions, reach their fundraising goals and achieve their program objectives. He has built and maintained elected officials’ offices, managed political campaigns, helped public agencies increase their effectiveness, and advised private companies and associations on their philanthropic and civic responsibilities.

Related
Penn’s Pittance is Useful, Overdue, and Vastly Insufficient
By Ruth McCambridge
November 18, 2020
Faculty Press Case for Penn to Ante Up and Support Philly Schools
By Steve Dubb
September 24, 2020
“Nightmare” Budget Scenarios Inspire Proposals to Tax Rich at Higher Rates
By Ruth McCambridge
September 16, 2020
Backing Community Organizers, Philadelphia Inquirer Calls for PILOT Payments
By Ruth McCambridge
August 13, 2020
Philadelphia Activists Call on Penn to Pay Partial Property Tax to City
By Steve Dubb
July 27, 2020
Why the City-Nonprofit Relationship Must Change: Lessons from COVID-19
By Paul Nelson
May 13, 2020

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 21, 2 pm ET

Remaking the Economy

Health, Racial Disparities, and Economic Justice

other posts by The Author
Will Michigan Philanthropy’s Support of Economic...
By Larry Kaplan and Steve Dubb
March 22, 2018
What Was Rage Philanthropy After All?—And Has It Run Its...
By Ruth McCambridge and Larry Kaplan
March 13, 2018
Courts Pull Tax Exemptions for Big Nonprofits
By Larry Kaplan
March 7, 2018
CYNDI SUAREZ
The Nonprofit Racial Leadership Gap: Flipping the Lens
Powerful Interests Seek to Make Puerto Rico the Hong Kong of the...
Moving Beyond the Privilege of White Tears
logo
Donate
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletters