logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Grassroots Fundraising Journal
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • About
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Featured Articles
  • Webinars
    • Free Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
Policy, Social Enterprise

Trend Report: Sector-Switching

Jennifer Amanda Jones
March 28, 2014
Share
Email
Tweet
Share

Until recently, the boundary between for-profit and nonprofit, at least in theory and public perception, was clear. There was a distinction, codified by legal status and crystalized in a collective understanding of disparate motivations and bottom lines. The for-profit world made a profit, and the nonprofit world made a difference.

Today, that boundary has become increasingly blurred, at least in terms of discourse. The term social enterprise is bandied about with very little exactitude. It is linked to the development of so-called hybrid forms like B corporations and L3Cs, neither of which have been proven to be monuments to effectiveness so far. Perhaps that is not where the real action is; perhaps it’s in hybridity—that is, borrowing from and linking to the work of the other sector while retaining a clear sense of integrity. (Nonprofit Quarterly will have much more about this last topic in the next edition of the print journal.)

 

We know, for example, that for-profit companies can make a social difference in many ways, not the least of which include minimizing externalities, providing both productive and rewarding work environments, and adopting socially conscious missions. NPQ recently ran an article urging businesses to become more nonprofit-like, while at the same time nonprofits have been increasingly encouraged to become more “business-like”—whatever that means. As the boundary between for-profit and nonprofit becomes increasingly obscured, some organizations are switching incorporation status from one sector to another, some are using practices clearly identified with another sector, and some have wandered into the muddy area of hybrids.

In recent years, NPQ has reported on many examples of organizations adopting practices from other sectors. For example, we have reported on crowdfunding by independent bookstores. We have reported on efforts that blend sectors, like nonprofit and for-profit theater collaborations, and we have discussed the emergence of players from one sector in a field originally dominated by another, as in for-profit breast-milk collectors. We have also documented fields where it appears that one sector performs better than another based on outcomes, as in for-profit disability service providers and college and professional sports. All of these examples illustrate a bidirectional trend toward sector switching. At times, for-profits are becoming nonprofit—in mission, if not in tax status—and nonprofits are becoming for-profitsin operation, if not on the balance sheet.

These newswires have also raised important questions:

  • Should for-profit companies be asked to pay a “fair” share of taxes before using their money to save the world?
  • Are there some fields where nonprofits should dominate because they deliver a better service, and does the reverse hold true of for-profit entities as well?
  • When organizations switch sectors, are they fully considering the ramifications of ownership, transparency, and profits?
  • How important is transparency to donors, volunteers, and the public being served? If a for-profit can do the job with greater cost efficiency, does transparency or other distinctions brought by nonprofits still matter?
  • Would a shift from community-based nonprofits with significant community experience to for-profit providers without those community ties affect quality of service? Is there something more valuable about services delivered by nonprofits, as opposed to those bankrolled and offered by for-profits?
  • When a nonprofit collaborates with a for-profit, is the nonprofit’s value proposition to the society eroded? Specifically, does a nonprofit become incentivized to neglect some of the values, principles, goals, and target populations it was created to serve? How can we manage these relationships such that that does not occur?
  • If small for-profit companies and start ups crowdfund to stay afloat, will that impact charity, and is that okay?
  • And when all is said and done, shouldn’t every business be a social enterprise?

We don’t pretend to know the answers or to know what the future holds. We do believe there are some deep and fundamental concerns that get lost in the hype and blur.

We encourage leaders of all sectors to consider the following: What is it that distinguishes this sector from others? What about those distinctions gives us an edge in some fields? How might we better honor and build on those strengths?

Share
Email
Tweet
Share

About The Author
Jennifer Amanda Jones

Jennifer Amanda Jones, Ph.D. is the Assistant Professor of Nonprofit Management and Leadership at the University of Florida. Her research interests include nonprofit management, philanthropic giving, and social enterprise initiatives. She is a member of Nu Lambda Mu, the international honor society for nonprofit scholars. Prior to her academic career, Dr. Jones was involved in research projects benchmarking the nonprofit sector in San Diego and in the State of California. Additionally, Dr. Jones has spent more than 15 years working with nonprofit organizations of various types and sizes. She also served on the board of directors for a community foundation.

Related
Impact Investing Is Ubiquitous, but Where’s the Impact?
By Steve Dubb
December 2, 2020
Strategically Responding to Disruption through Social Enterprise
By Barb Hiltz and Peter Boumgarden
September 23, 2020
Getting Social Enterprise Right: An Integrated Revenue Business Model
By Betsy Beaumon
August 19, 2020
A Social Enterprise-Supported Nonprofit Faces the Challenge of COVID-19
By Martin Levine
May 28, 2020
Large Nonprofits Argue Their Need for PPP-Type Relief
By Ruth McCambridge
May 7, 2020
Leading Canadian Social Enterprise Winds Down Operations
By Niduk D'Souza
February 3, 2020

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 21, 2 pm ET

Remaking the Economy

Health, Racial Disparities, and Economic Justice

other posts by The Author
LGBTQ Hate-Based Murder Rates Rose Even Before Orlando
By Jennifer Amanda Jones and Chelsea Carnes
June 16, 2016
Nonprofit Physics Lesson as Local Nonprofits Resist Copycat...
By Jennifer Amanda Jones and Chelsea Carnes
May 12, 2016
Gender Equity in the United States: A $4.3 Trillion...
By Jennifer Amanda Jones
April 8, 2016
CYNDI SUAREZ
The Nonprofit Racial Leadership Gap: Flipping the Lens
Powerful Interests Seek to Make Puerto Rico the Hong Kong of the...
Moving Beyond the Privilege of White Tears
logo
Donate