logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

When Words Count (Against You)

Bruce S Trachtenberg
December 24, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

December 22, 2010; Source:  New York Times | In this age of Twitter, a lot of people pride themselves on writing short, especially their ability to never exceed the 140-character-count limit imposed by the microblogging service. But a different kind of word- and character- limitation is plaguing users of the online Common Application and the nonprofit group that created it to—at least in principle—make it easier for high school seniors to apply for college.

As the name implies, the Common Application is an admission form that those angling for a slot at a college or university can use to apply to any of 400 participating institutions.  Unfortunately, many users of the electronic version of the form – which can also be downloaded and filled out the old fashioned way – are discovering that the system is automatically truncating some of the information applicants enter online.

Rob Killion, executive director of the Common Application, acknowledges the problem, which the New York Times says sometimes cuts off text “at the margin, in midsentence or even midword.”  Common Application officials have an answer to why responses to questions are being cut off but they can’t fix the problem.  “Believe me, if there’s a way to do it, we’d do it.” said Killion.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The problem is that while the automated system tells applicants they must limit their entries to a set number of words, the program instead counts spaces and characters. Therein lies the rub—not all characters are created equal. As the Times notes, “because some letters may take up more space than others, one applicant’s 145-word essay may be too long, while another’s 157-word response may come up short.”

To help prevent embarrassing applications being submitted, applicants are supposed to review the completed forms using the preview feature before submitting.  Still, users complain that constantly reworking the entries to meet the requisite character count is not a pleasant task.  Wiley Davis, a senior at Mira Costa High in Manhattan Beach, Calif., said, “I had to do a great deal of work to get my point across without running over and cutting information.”  Anyone volunteer to tweet this story in 140-characters or less?—Bruce Trachtenberg

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
What Nigeria Can Teach the US About Food Insecurity
Chidinma Iwu
Arab American Philanthropy
Tamara El-Khoury
Forerunners of Food Justice: Black Farmer Movement Spans Generations
Demetrius Hunter
What Would a Social Justice Investment Ecosystem Look Like?
Steve Dubb
Measuring Healthcare Equity in North Carolina
Sonia Sarkar
The Nonprofit Sector and Social Change: A Conversation between Cyndi Suarez and Claire Dunning
Claire Dunning and Cyndi Suarez

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.