logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Why Pay Attention to All This “Big Picture” Stuff?

Jonathan Spack
June 21, 2001
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

At the recent annual conference of the Alliance for Nonprofit Management, Paul Light spoke eloquently about some of the “big picture” issues that he and other leading thinkers of our sector are focusing on—things such as our collective identity and our place in U.S. society. Paul’s twin brother Mark, who heads a nonprofit in Dayton, Ohio, was a respondent. Mark’s first comment was, more or less, “That’s all very interesting, Paul, and I’m glad there are people like you to think about these things, but I have an organization to run every day, and that kind of reflective time isn’t on my agenda. I want to know how your work will help me with mine.”

To me, it seemed especially apt to have twins reflect these two legitimate yet contrasting perspectives, because they represent the yin and yang of nonprofit practice. Many of us struggle daily with the need to be visionary and practical simultaneously. The global issues are important, obviously. For one thing, deliberations and conclusions about the “proper” role for our sector determine governmental and foundation policy-making that can impact nonprofits and philanthropy for decades. Equally importantly, these public conversations shape the way each of us thinks about our own organization in relation to other nonprofits and our constituents—our “mental model” of our place in society. If we aren’t clear ourselves about being part of a powerful, cohesive sector of society and about what the sector’s role is, we will not be effective advocates for our constituents.

But Mark Light’s question is not trivial. Like Mark, many of us have very limited opportunity to worry about these issues. We may want to spend time thinking globally, or even regionally, but we’ve got more immediate concerns: getting proposals out on time, dealing with internal personnel and financial management issues, keeping our boards up to date, meeting with funders, trying to plan programs, figuring out how to integrate technology into our operations without breaking the budget, and so on. And some of us actually prefer this type of daily management challenge—where tasks have a beginning, middle, and end—to the abstract thinking required for big-picture policy-making.

The danger, though, of burying ourselves in the details of daily operations is that we risk contradicting the very principle we claim to stand for: constituent involvement in decision-making. For as nonprofit advocates, service providers, and associations, we are key stakeholders in the third sector, and as such we have an obligation to make our voices heard on the issues that affect us directly and to participate as equal partners in defining our relationships with business and government. Even in the 21st century, these relationships are too often colored, on all sides, by the outmoded, noblesse oblige notion of nonprofits as recipients of charity who should be grateful for whatever beneficence those with wealth and power deign to bestow upon us.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

If we fail to articulate and advocate for a more appropriate paradigm that recognizes the central place of the nonprofit sector in creating and maintaining community and culture, others whose views and values we may find objectionable or simply uninformed will control the debate and determine the policies that will govern our work and impact our colleagues and constituents. We jeopardize this work and those constituents if we do not advocate consistently and effectively for ourselves, at whatever level is possible given our resources and talents.

So the next time you hear a speaker talk about “the role of the nonprofit sector,” or are asked to sign on to support or oppose a piece of legislation, or see an article on the latest trends in nonprofit management, don’t close your ears or roll your eyes or turn the page—even if that’s your first impulse. Take a few moments or more to consider how you might respond or participate from the perspective of a member of a large and powerful community of nonprofits; then do it! Remember the old slogan from the 60s: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.

About the Author
Jonathan Spack is executive director of Third Sector New England.

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Jonathan Spack

Jonathan Spack is executive director of Third Sector New England.

More about: OpinionPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.