logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Will the US Confront Its Long History of Border Atrocities?

Steve Dubb
January 15, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
United States Border Patrol (USBP) [Public domain or Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

January 12, 2019; The Intercept

In 2018, federal cruelty toward immigrants gained national prominence, as the Trump administration’s policy of separating children from their families was exposed. This led to an executive order rescinding family separation, although the crisis continues. Proposed alternatives such as a proposal floated to engage in the indefinite detainment of entire families in internment camps would by no means excise cruelty from the system—it would just adjust the form it takes.

But current policies are less exceptional than they appear. The consistency by which migrants crossing the southern US border have been treated by federal officials as criminals or worse is of little surprise to those who have followed US-Mexican relations. Greg Grandin, a Bancroft Prize-winning historian at New York University (NYU) and most recently author of a book titled, The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America, says the US Border Patrol, founded in 1924, has arguably been the most “abusive branch of federal law enforcement,” even worse than the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover.

The founding of the Border Patrol, Grandin notes, is rooted in the 1924 Immigration Act. “Most countries were now subject to a set quota system, with the highest numbers assigned to western Europe,” but Grandin points out that US business interests ensured that Mexico remained exempt from a quota. The Border Patrol was a concession to those who had wanted a quota.

Grandin explains:

While the 1924 immigration law spared Mexico a quota, a series of secondary laws—including one that made it a crime to enter the country outside official ports of entry—gave border and customs agents on-the-spot discretion to decide who could enter the country legally. They had the power to turn what had been a routine daily or seasonal event—crossing the border to go to work—into a ritual of abuse. Hygienic inspections became more widespread and even more degrading. Migrants had their heads shaved, and they were subjected to an increasingly arbitrary set of requirements and the discretion of patrollers, including literacy tests and entrance fees.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Grandin adds, “Border agents beat, shot, and hung migrants with regularity.” A brief reform effort to the border patrol occurred during the Roosevelt administration, but agriculture interests succeeded in shifting the Border Patrol agency to be under the Department of Justice, more or less vitiating the reforms that the US Department of Labor, under the leadership of Secretary Frances Perkins, had been implementing.

Then, in 1965, immigration law changed again. While the law greatly liberalized immigration from previously restricted regions of Europe and Asia, it assigned quotas to Mexico and other countries in Latin America. Thousands of Mexican seasonal farmworkers who had been routinely migrating on an annual basis to the US suddenly became “illegal” in the eyes of US policy—and this opened the door to increased Border Patrol abuses.

John Crewdson, Grandin notes, won a Pulitzer in 1980 for a series of articles published in the New York Times, including one titled “Border Sweeps of Illegal Aliens Leave Scores of Children in Jails,” that highlighted many of the abuses, including ‘beatings, murder, torture, and rape, including the rape of girls as young as 12.’”

“Separating migrant families was not official government policy in the years Crewdson was reporting on abuses,” Grandin explains. “But left to their own devices, Border Patrol agents regularly took children from parents, threatening that they would be separated ‘forever’ unless one of them confessed that they had entered the country illegally.”

Human Rights Watch, Grandin adds, reported in 1993 that at a border patrol substation in Harlingen, Texas, “physical abuse is often coupled with due process abuses meant to terrorize victims of brutality.” Nor is the substation an outlier. A 2018 Guardian article reports that, “Since 2003, Border Patrol agents have killed at least 97 people, including six children,” with very few agents being prosecuted. A 2018 report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), notes that “thousands of documents” show “widespread horrific abuse of child immigrants” while in custody. This includes, notes Grandin, many instances of young girls being physically abused and threatened with rape, while unaccompanied children have experienced “physical and psychological abuse, unsanitary and inhumane living conditions, isolation from family members, extended period of detention, and denial of access to legal medical service.”

Grandin concludes by emphasizing that, “The viciousness we are witnessing today at the border, directed at children and adults, has a long history, a fact that should in no way mitigate the extraordinary cruelty of Donald Trump. But it does suggest that if the US is to climb out of the moral abyss it has fallen into, it has to think well beyond Trump’s malice.”—Steve Dubb

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Steve Dubb

Steve Dubb is senior editor of economic justice at NPQ, where he writes articles (including NPQ’s Economy Remix column), moderates Remaking the Economy webinars, and works to cultivate voices from the field and help them reach a broader audience. Prior to coming to NPQ in 2017, Steve worked with cooperatives and nonprofits for over two decades, including twelve years at The Democracy Collaborative and three years as executive director of NASCO (North American Students of Cooperation). In his work, Steve has authored, co-authored, and edited numerous reports; participated in and facilitated learning cohorts; designed community building strategies; and helped build the field of community wealth building. Steve is the lead author of Building Wealth: The Asset-Based Approach to Solving Social and Economic Problems (Aspen 2005) and coauthor (with Rita Hodges) of The Road Half Traveled: University Engagement at a Crossroads, published by MSU Press in 2012. In 2016, Steve curated and authored Conversations on Community Wealth Building, a collection of interviews of community builders that Steve had conducted over the previous decade.

More about: police reformCustoms and Border PatrolNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.