logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Two Universities’ Encounter with a Firm under SEC Investigation: Years of Donations in Question

Ruth McCambridge
April 25, 2016

ohio-state-u

April 24, 2016; Register-Guard (Eugene, OR)

NPQ has covered a number of cases where gifts to philanthropy have been used to help construct the image of success needed to con business investors out of their money. And this story appears no different—resulting in a crisis that’s not only reputational but also carries the risk of a demand for a return of gifts so that defrauded investors can be repaid.

Aequitas Capital Management, a finance firm in Lake Oswego, Oregon, announced a few months ago that it would give scholarships to students of finance at the University of Oregon and Oregon State University. At the same time, the firm was opening a new office in Manhattan and, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, spending as though the company were larger than it was in an effort to bring new investors in to cover payments to old investors in what the SEC describes as a classic Ponzi scheme. The firm was, in fact, in what the SEC termed “calamitous financial condition.”

Aequitas CEO Bob Jesenik and Vice President Brian Oliver were alums of UO and OSU respectively. Each had given to the two Oregon public universities over some years and had been in volunteer leadership roles. But all of that will grind to a halt as a receiver has been appointed by the federal court to rescue as much of investors’ funds as possible by closing dozens of Aequitas-created subsidiaries and investment funds. And when that happens, there is every possibility that the court will also try to “claw back” some of those donated dollars.

The total that had been donated by the two men is not yet known, but UO has spent all the money Aequitas has donated. As yet, OSU officials were unable to provide a current accounting of what had been given.

Aequitas’ business model was based on unconventional investments, many some kind of debt obligations, that promised high returns.

In 2007, Jesenik became one of the founders of UO’s Cameron Center for Finance and Securities Analysis. He was also on the college’s business advisory council, which meets twice a year to guide the dean. Jesenik was a judge at the annual student business plan competition and gave to the college’s general purpose Investors Fund.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Oliver, who was the Aequitas executive vice president and Jesenik’s longtime chief money raiser, received a “distinguished early career” award from OSU in 2008 for his work at Aequitas. He was on the college’s Entrepreneurial Education Advisory Board, the Austin Entrepreneurship Program Advisory Board, and the “Dean’s Circle of Excellence,” which is made up of large donors.

In short, the relationship is pretty intimate, but OSU spokesman Steve Clark says that is essentially no big loss. “A businessperson or business representative on a board like that is one of many voices,” Clark said. “They don’t actually establish a course, a direction or a philosophy for the college—in this case the College of Business—but they provide advice, guidance and support to the dean. Their involvement, or their lack of involvement in the future, would not affect the direction of the college.”

Way to go on making the surviving donors feel special, Steve.

The immediate cause of Aequitas’s failure may have started with its purchase of student debt from for-profit Corinthian Colleges, which collapsed in 2014 after federal pressure was brought to bear about their lending practices. Faced with debt that was now virtually uncollectable, Aequitas turned to new investors to cover their operating deficits.

“Rather than change the business to reduce expenses or increase operating income,” the SEC alleges, “Jesenik and Oliver decided to cover the cash shortfall—and continue paying the growing expenses of the enterprise, including their own salaries, a private jet and pilots, and dinners and golf outings for prospective investors—by raising funds from new investors and convincing prior investors to reinvest. Between January 2014 and January 2016, they raised approximately $350 million.”

Jesenik and Oliver were ousted by the SEC action in March.

This is not the first rodeo for UO, which had a similar encounter in the late 1990s with Capital Consultants, a Portland investment firm. Jeffrey Grayson, the firm’s CEO and an alumnus, served as president of the UO Foundation in the mid-1990s and was co-chairman of UO President Dave Frohnmayer’s “Campaign for Oregon,” which raised record sums. The law school building was renamed Grayson Hall before that company, also known for unorthodox deals, was subjected to an SEC investigation; in that case, the court-appointed receiver did try to recover $850,000 from the UO for investors. In the end, “The university waited six months as criticism mounted and then returned the $850,000. Over the subsequent winter break, the university scraped Grayson’s name off of the remodeled building’s sign and replaced it with [its former name] ‘McKenzie Hall.’”—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Equity-Centered ManagementFundraisingHigher EducationNonprofit News
See comments

You might also like
Does Personal Investment Hurt Fundraising?
Rochelle Jerry
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
If Farm School NYC Closes, What Will the City Lose?
Farm School NYC and Iris M. Crawford
Be Bold This GivingTuesday: Lessons from Public Rights Project
Jennifer Johnson
Leading “Against the Current”: A Conversation with Eveline Shen
Isaiah Thompson and Eveline Shen
GivingTuesday: Ride the Wave, Don’t Fight It
Rhea Wong

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks into a microphone in front of a sign reading "We are the Supermajority" while an audience listens.
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is...
Jennifer Gerson
A wooden bridge leading to an forested area, representing how personal investment should be a bridge, not a business model.
Does Personal Investment Hurt Fundraising?
Rochelle Jerry
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.