Skip to content
Donate Now
  • Donate Now
  • logo
  • logo
  • News
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising
    • Crowdfunding
    • Development
    • Donor Retention
  • Philanthropy
    • Philanthropy
    • Foundations
    • Grantmaking
    • Online Giving
  • Management
    • Management
    • Board Governance
    • Finance
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Activism
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Healthcare
    • Taxes
  • Webinars
  • Magazine
  • Opinion
    • Editor’s Notes
    • The Cohen Report
    • Dr. Conflict
    • The Nonprofit Ethicist
    • Unraveling Development
    • Voices from the Field
  • Store
  • Donate Now

  • Subscribe
  • Member Log in
  • Manage Subscription
Link to subscription form
  • News
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising
    • Crowdfunding
    • Development
    • Donor Retention
  • Philanthropy
    • Philanthropy
    • Foundations
    • Grantmaking
    • Online Giving
  • Management
    • Management
    • Board Governance
    • Finance
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Activism
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Healthcare
    • Taxes
  • Webinars
  • Magazine
  • Opinion
    • Editor’s Notes
    • The Cohen Report
    • Dr. Conflict
    • The Nonprofit Ethicist
    • Unraveling Development
    • Voices from the Field
  • Store
  • My Menu

No Womb for Old Men

By Louis Altman Louis Altman | February 15, 2017
Share31
Share
Tweet
Email
Shares 31

February 13, 2017; Women’s Health

By a thousand cuts over the last several years, state legislatures across the United States, largely Republican-controlled, have been trying to subvert the federal Constitutional protection, as defined in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, of the right of pregnant women to have abortions. On Tuesday, an Oklahoma State House Committee continued this trend, voting to bring HB 1441 before the full House, which would require the sire’s (father’s) approval for a woman seeking an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest or abortion. Breeding terminology seems to be apt here, as a chauvinist attitude has resurfaced in government towards women, unleashing an ugly tendency of disregard and dehumanization.

The hearing took about thirty seconds, with a brief introduction by the bill’s author, Rep. Justin Humphrey, and no debate. Humphrey believes women are like the owners of bed & breakfast inns when it comes to bearing a child, calling them “hosts” who alone should have to deal with the consequences of their soi-disant insouciant attitude towards sex. Echoing a contemporary and convenient trend of male politicians wielding power the federal Constitution is supposed to wrest from them, Humphrey stated Wednesday last week, “I understand that [women] feel like that is their body…I feel like it is a separate—what I call them is, is you’re a ‘host.’ And you know when you enter into a relationship you’re going to be that host and so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and don’t get pregnant.”

Humphrey alleged that his original intention was for HB 1441 to require the man to pay child support from the beginning, but that did not make the final version of the restrictive bill, which on its face ignores the responsibility and burden of the man in procreation and seeks to empower men to exercise greater control of reproductive rights. There are, of course, many female politicians and pro-life citizens who are in favor of restricting abortion rights, but this movement is largely driven by the men who control most, if not all, state legislatures.

NPQ has been keeping close watch on the sweeping movement across the country to chip away at the pro-choice freedom enshrined as constitutional law in the 1973 landmark decision Roe v. Wade, and as modified by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. In December of last year, NPQ reported that the Ohio legislature passed a “heartbeat” abortion bill that would render illegal the abortion of a fetus whose heartbeat is detected, which can happen as early as six weeks into the gestational period. Governor Kasich vetoed that bill later in December, though he did sign into law a 20-week abortion ban. In June of 2016, NPQ reflected on a flurry of anti-abortion bills that may have led to a marked increase in at-home abortion attempts. Evidence of this linkage was the upward tick of Google searches in 2015 seeking instruction on how women can terminate their pregnancies on their own, to over 700,000, relatively more frequent in states with restrictive anti-abortion laws. This article noted an Oklahoma bill that would make performing an abortion a felony, and a contemporary Louisiana bill that would outlaw second trimester abortions utilizing the safest method for that gestational period. Echoing many other press outlets, NPQ stated in this article that “politicians and anti-abortion groups are finding every loophole to prevent women from receiving the abortion services they are entitled to by federal law.”

In spite of our country’s founding documents and subsequent court rulings, rights are proving not to be inalienable and must be fought for, as evidenced by this snowballing momentum of the pro-life movement shepherded by many state governments. As with many other political controversies cleaving our nation in two, abortion is increasingly polarizing the populace, as laws chipping away at abortion rights take effect. The U.S. Supreme Court is waiting in the wings to “refresh” Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, as it is expected the Court will grant certiorari in the next few years to one or more cases challenging these new state anti-abortion laws. With the makeup and the leanings of the inscrutable Supreme Court in flux, the path of legal abortion and the success of its challengers is unpredictable at this heightened moment of tension.—Louis Altman

Share31
Share
Tweet
Email
Shares 31

About Louis Altman

Louis Altman

Louis Altman is a Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor with the Syracuse, New York office of ACCES-VR, a state agency that works with people with disabilities to help them achieve vocational goals and other related objectives. A licensed attorney in New York for over twenty years, Louis is also an adjunct professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo, teaching Legal & Ethical Issues in Counseling for the University's masters program in Rehabilitation Counseling, a program he graduated from. Louis has been writing newswires for NPQ since 2012. He has a wide variety of interests in the arts, business and sociology, and whatever unique and influential developments NPQ readers might find valuable to know. To leverage his training and experience he is working with NPQ to develop a focus on legal and vocational issues relevant to the nonprofit community.

  • More by Louis

Read Next

  • New Florida Law Declares Open Season on Science Education

    Under this new legislation, local Florida school districts must now offer residents the chance to publicly challenge the curriculum or textbooks on offer. Through an ostensible effort to “embrace ‘academic freedom’ and present the full spectrum of views on evolution and climate change,” the disputes that will follow will drain educational resources.

Popular Posts

  1. A Graphic Re-visioning of Nonprofit Overhead
  2. You First: Leadership for a New World—“Three Tests of Leadership”
  3. The University Elephant in the Room: Where’s Community Engagement Headed?
  4. Problem Boards or Board Problem?
  5. Wounded Warrior and Komen Show Similar Deep Donation Drops after Their Respective Scandals
  6. Glassdoor Ratings and the Nonprofit Workplace

Write for NPQ

  • Our Mission
  • Advertise
  • Board of Directors
  • Foundations and Funders
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • NPQ Staff
  • Contact Us
  • Press Release
  • Donors
  • Newsletters
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Back to top ↑

To Access the Full Article, Please Login or Subscribe

Can't Login?

Register a New Account Forgot Password

Continue Reading
31 Shares
Share31
Share
Tweet
Email