logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Fund Development
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Webinars
    • Leading Edge Membership
    • Sponsored Webinars
    • Economic Justice
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
Charter Schools

Inquiry Planned into Maine Governor’s Threat to Yank Funding from Charter School

Ruth McCambridge
July 2, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
0 Shares

July 1, 2015; Wall Street Journal

Four lawmakers in Maine have requested an investigation into Republican Maine Governor Paul LePage’s behavior with one of the state’s charter schools based on the school’s plan to hire a Democratic rival. NPQ previously covered this situation as it originally played out. And, as far as we can see the inquiry will move forward after a unanimous vote by the 12-member bipartisan joint oversight committee approved the request.

The Governor is reported to have threatened to pull more than half a million in funding from the Good Will-Hinckley school based on the fact that it had offered the organization’s presidency to Maine House Speaker Mark Eves. LePage claimed that the hire was based on cronyism.  Eves, a therapist with experience in behavioral health, is accusing the governor of blackmail and is planning to file a civil suit. Meanwhile the school is paying Eves $30,000 for having backed out of its contract with him and it is under fire for allowing itself to be bullied.

Central Maine.Com reports that alumni and parents feel that the Good Will-Hinckley board’s decision to withdraw a job offer to Mark Eves is a bad example for students indicating that bullying is acceptable  and that money trumps values.

Jack Moore, Chair of the board has responded said in a telephone interview Monday that he just wanted to let the whole situation and that the board made the decision that was in the best interest of the students. “As fiduciaries faced with the loss of state and significant private funding, the very real financial consequences for the school made the board’s unanimous decision on June 24 black and white,” said Moore. Contrast this to the stand-up behavior of the Girl Scout Council we discussed yesterday.

On Monday LePage acknowledged to reporters that he threatened to pull funding because he didn’t believe Mr. Eves was right for the job although how that call entered the realm of the governorship is anyone’s guess.

LePage’s stance is that the probe is illegitimate. “The Governor and the exercise of his discretionary executive power are simply not subject to OPEGA’s jurisdiction and/or oversight,”  Cynthia Montgomery, the governor’s chief legal counsel, wrote in a letter to the office’s director on Tuesday.

Meanwhile Chris Christie got into the act today while he was in Portland receiving the Governor’s endorsement, publicly supporting the position taken by LePage.

“Controversies come and go. Leadership is what stands strong and firm. And that’s what this governor has stood for his entire time in office,” Governor Christie said. Whatever that means. This situation clearly needs the legislative accountability attention though the facts appear to be relatively clear.—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
0 Shares

About The Author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor in Chief of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

Related
“Red Pedagogy” Sinks Indigenous Charter School Approval in NC Native Country
By Debby Warren
November 22, 2019
Turning a Profit through Nonprofit Charter Schools: Communities Get a Bad Deal
By Rob Meiksins
September 13, 2019
Ragging the Puck: Not a Viable Strategy for the Whole Game
By Scott Harshbarger
September 5, 2019
Unbalanced: A Map of Nonprofit Stakeholders
By The Editors
August 29, 2019
The Accountability Imbalance: What Nonprofits Need to Change
By Ruth McCambridge
August 29, 2019
Feedback and Participatory Grantmaking Are Complementary
By Melinda Tuan
August 28, 2019
other posts by The Author
Houston Police Chief Blames NRA-Compliant Senators for...
By Ruth McCambridge
December 10, 2019
Speculations on the Roots of the Loss of Small US Donors:...
By Ruth McCambridge
December 6, 2019
Houston United Way in its Own Crunch Does “Critical...
By Ruth McCambridge
December 6, 2019
A Series on Sensemaking Organizations
The Sensemaking Organization: Designing for Complexity
The Sensemaking Mindset: Improvisation over Strategy
Structuring for Sensemaking: The Power of Small Segments
logo
Donate
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletters
  • Write for NPQ
  • Advertise
  • Writers
  • Funders
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe to View Webinars

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by GDPR plugin
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.