logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Fund Development
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Webinars
    • Leading Edge Membership
    • Sponsored Webinars
    • Economic Justice
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
Policy

Mission-Driven EPA Employees Under Scrutiny by Republican PAC

Ruth McCambridge
December 19, 2017
Share26
Tweet3
Share
Email
29 Shares
“U.S. Environmental Protection Agency” by NRDC

December 17, 2017; New York Times

Employees who speak out about the weakening of the Environmental Protection Agency are apparently likely to find their emails under the scrutiny of a lawyer affiliated with a group called America Rising, whose “sole purpose,” according to its website, “is to hold Democrats responsible and expose their hidden hypocrisy. We use video tracking research and communication strategies to ensure they must account for every word and action.”

The New York Times reports that such hypocritical acts have included one EPA employee who “spoke up at a private lunch held near the agency headquarters, saying she feared the nation might be headed toward an ‘environmental catastrophe.’ Another staff member, from Seattle, sent a letter to Scott Pruitt, the EPA administrator, raising similar concerns about the direction of the agency. A third, from Philadelphia, went to a rally where he protested against agency budget cuts.”

Requests for copies of their emails were logged within a few days, asking for any materials mentioning President Trump or EPA head Scott Pruitt.

Now, the EPA itself has inked a $120,000 contract with a company called Definers Public Affairs. The partners at Definers are Joe Pounder and Matt Rhoades, who cofounded America Rising, and the two organizations share offices. Nine key staff overlap, including Allan L. Blutstein, who was the author of the Freedom of Information Act requests about the aforementioned employees.

Spokesman for the EPA Jahan Wilcox wrote in an email that the product being sold is simply an improved clipping service—“Definers was awarded the contract to do our press clips at a rate that is $87,000 cheaper than our previous vendor, and they are providing no other services.” Employees are unconvinced:

“This is a witch hunt against EPA employees who are only trying to protect human health and the environment,” said Gary Morton, an EPA employee in Philadelphia, who works on preventing spills from underground storage tanks. His emails were targeted seven days after he participated in a union rally in March challenging proposed budget cuts. “What they are doing is trying to intimidate and bully us into silence,” he said.

“Mr. Pruitt appears not to understand that the two most valuable assets EPA has is the country’s trust and a very committed professional work force,” said William K. Reilly, EPA administrator under George Bush. “This shows complete insensitivity, complete tone-deafness, or something worse.”—Ruth McCambridge

Share26
Tweet3
Share
Email
29 Shares

About The Author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor in Chief of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

Related
US Dep’t. of Education Backs Loan Servicers over Student Loan Borrowers
By Marian Conway
September 16, 2019
A University Foundation Sues Its Own College to Evade Public Records Request
By Marian Conway
September 9, 2019
Done Enriching Shareholders, PES Shutters South Philadelphia Refinery
By Skip Lockwood
July 3, 2019
A Transparency Shell Game in Hawaii Poses Problems for Civil Society
By Carole Levine
February 8, 2019
Deep Divide over UN’s Call for Action and Trump Climate Policy
By Jim Schaffer
September 12, 2018
Why Won’t ICE Reveal What It Spends in Settling Lawsuits?
By Carole Levine
August 20, 2018
other posts by The Author
Speculations on the Roots of the Loss of Small U.S. Donors:...
By Ruth McCambridge
December 6, 2019
Houston United Way in its Own Crunch Does “Critical...
By Ruth McCambridge
December 6, 2019
A Bookstore Goes to the Museum: Mad Collaborations that Make...
By Ruth McCambridge
December 6, 2019
A Series on Sensemaking Organizations
The Sensemaking Organization: Designing for Complexity
The Sensemaking Mindset: Improvisation over Strategy
Structuring for Sensemaking: The Power of Small Segments
logo
Donate
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletters
  • Write for NPQ
  • Advertise
  • Writers
  • Funders
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe to View Webinars

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by GDPR plugin
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.