January 15, 2013; Source: Wall Street Journal
One week ago today, on Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday, Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) announced that he would introduce a bill calling upon the Maryland legislature to abolish the death penalty in Maryland. O’Malley cited the death penalty’s high cost and ineffectiveness, and noted that its use puts the U.S. in the company of Iran, China, Yemen and North Korea—some of the few remaining bastions of government-sanctioned executions.
O’Malley hopes the time is ripe for change. At a news conference in Annapolis, Md. organized by the NAACP, the governor borrowed a signature King phrase: “Hate multiplies hate. Violence multiplies violence.” In 2009, the governor failed with a similar effort, leading to compromise legislation requiring an increased standard of proof in capital punishment cases such as DNA evidence or video evidence linking a defendant to a killing. Meant to be stringent and fair, many think that effort merely exacerbated racial bias in sentencing, as evidenced by O’Malley’s renewed vigor on the issue and the NAACP’s sponsorship of Tuesday’s event. If the governor’s wish is fulfilled, Maryland will follow five other states that have removed the death penalty in recent years. NPQ noted the repeal of the death penalty in Connecticut last year and Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico, and New York have also repealed capital punishment since 2007. Thirty-three states maintain capital punishment laws.
Sign up for our free newsletter
Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
To some extent, O’Malley’s effort looks akin to putting a cap on an empty bottle. Maryland has only executed five inmates since reinstatement of its death penalty in 1978, and no one has been executed in the state since 2004. The last death sentence in the state was issued in 2005. “If you look over 30 or 40 years, the death penalty was on the books and yet Baltimore still became the most violent and addicted city in America,” O’Malley said. “Having the death penalty on the books did nothing to keep the homicides from rising.” O’Malley also stated, “We know what does not work. And we know that the way forward is always found through greater respect for the human dignity of all.”
Proponents of preserving the state’s capital punishment program are equally passionate, but appear short on statistics. “This governor’s priorities are all messed up,” said Republican House of Delegates member Neil Parrott. “By watering down punishments for violent crime, he’s encouraging crime to happen in Maryland rather than in Virginia or other states,” Parrott pleaded. In the Maryland State Senate, 24 of 47 votes will be required to move the legislation on to the state House of Delegates, where its passage is, reportedly, nearly guaranteed. State Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, a Democrat, is pro-death penalty but is said to promise to bring a vote to the full Senate if 24 votes are mustered in favor of repeal. Echoing Parrott, Miller said that he would rather expand the death penalty than eliminate it.
According to a recent Gallup poll, 63 percent of Americans support capital punishment, down from a high of approximately 80 percent in the early 1990s. Is this controversy a moral question or should the death penalty’s ability, or lack thereof, to reduce killing be the only germane issue? And should governments simply follow public opinion on issues of life and death? Where do you stand? –Louis Altman