November 14, 2013; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
What is a housing trust fund that has little or no money? It is a resource that can’t deliver for the needs of lower-income people who need improvements in housing conditions and housing affordability. In 2010, the Pennsylvania legislature created the Pennsylvania Housing Trust Fund, but didn’t put any money into it.
According to Post-Gazette writer Kate Giammarise, the Trust Fund was meant to support rental assistance for families in danger of becoming homeless, the rehabilitation of rental housing for low-income families, modifications of housing to accommodate the elderly and people with disabilities, and demolition of blighted properties.
Advocates are pushing for a $25 million appropriation for the fund. So far, the state legislature has authorized only $5 million annually from the Marcellus Shale Impact Fee, but for use only in counties with shale drilling, which would omit 30 of the state’s 67 counties from access to the Trust Fund.
Sign up for our free newsletter
Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
Liz Hersh, the executive director of the Housing Alliance of Pennsylvania, is one of the leaders of a campaign launched this week to “fund the fund”. Hersh said that the $25 million would be on top of the $5 million anticipated from the shale fee. The key to a trust fund, however, is dedicated sources of revenue, so that the fund isn’t dependent on year-to-year legislative appropriations. Hersh said that the Alliance is reviewing various potential revenue sources, though she wouldn’t say which ones.
Hersh and her allies have a number of models of state and even local housing trust funds to draw on. In Darien, Connecticut, a housing trust fund is being created, capitalized by funds from private developers who in lieu of providing inclusionary affordable units in their developments can make a cash payment to the fund. Jersey City has a trust fund to which developers contribute in exchange for their access to tax incentives for their developments. Longtime affordable housing advocates Mark Schwartz of Regional Housing Legal Services and John Paone, the former executive director of the Philadelphia Housing Authority, have proposed the capitalization of the Philadelphia Housing Trust Fund with 10 years of annual contributions by the winning bidder of the city’s new casino gambling license.
The Housing Trust Fund Project of the Center for Community Change identifies 47 states and the District of Columbia as having created 57 state trust funds (some states have more than one). Hersh and the Alliance have a number of models of dedicated revenue to consider based on these other state housing trust funds: interest on real estate escrow accounts (WI, MN, CT), real estate transfer taxes or fees (WV, VT, SC, NJ, IA, IL, HW, DC), document recording fees (CT, DE, IL, WA, VA, OR, FL, NE, MA, KY, DC), national mortgage settlement funds (VA, NE, MI, CO), unclaimed personal property funds (AZ, SD), interest on tenant security deposits (OR), and smokeless tobacco tax revenues (IN), in addition to revenues dedicated from general obligation bonds.
In each instance of a state housing trust fund, it was nonprofit housing advocates who mobilized to press the states to do more for low-income households in need of decent, affordable housing. Pennsylvania’s shale fee is a unique dedicated revenue source, but small and geographically limited. Whatever decision the Pennsylvania state legislature makes on the Keystone State’s housing trust fund, the advocacy of the state’s nonprofit housing groups will be key.—Rick Cohen