January 9, 2014; Christian Science Monitor
Yesterday, President Obama launched another place-based community development program. In this instance, it is the “Promise Zone” program, aimed at helping poor people in five announced zones: San Antonio, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, southeastern Kentucky and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. Ultimately, the administration hopes to designate 20 promise zones that will have zone designations for 10-year periods.
President Obama’s administration has had other place-based initiatives during its first term, such as the Promise Neighborhoods program of the Department of Education, the Sustainable Communities program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (in conjunction with the Department of Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency), and HUD’s Choice Neighborhoods. But Promise Zones look most like the Clinton-era Empowerment Zone program. Like Empowerment Zones, Obama’s Promise Zones will offer a variety of tax credits to promote job creation plus a pledge of interagency coordinated efforts addressing social problems such as high crime and poor education in the designated neighborhoods.
The tax incentives, however, haven’t been passed by Congress yet, although the expectation is that tax credits are generally well received by Republicans and therefore stand a chance of enactment. Unlike the Empowerment Zones program, which gave as much as $100 million to each EZ and up to $3 million to “enterprise communities,” the new Promise Zone programs involves no new direct funding to the targeted neighborhoods, though there is the implicit promise of preferential consideration for existing federal funding programs.
Sign up for our free newsletter
Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
While the administration acknowledges that Promise Zones are modeled substantially on Empowerment Zones, an advisor to the program, James Quane, the associate director of the Joblessness and Urban Poverty Research Program at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, says “this is a new twist.” It had better offer something new, as the experience of the Empowerment Zones was mixed at best. Some were distinctly unsuccessful, while for others, there were implications that the tax incentives basically involved moving jobs from one community to another rather than generating substantial new employment.
Despite the absence of direct funding commitments and the lack of authorizing legislation for the planned tax incentives, the designated Promise Zone communities seem to be excited about their new visibility.
- Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti lauded what he described as a “wraparound” approach to federal funding built into the Promise Zones, where funding, albeit not from new appropriations, would come from multiple agencies to attack poverty in the Los Angeles district, which includes the neighborhoods of Pico-Union, Westlake, Koreatown, East Hollywood, and Hollywood.
- San Antonio’s Mayor Julian Castro welcomed the program to his city as “a promising investment in creating more job opportunities and revitalizing neighborhoods on the East Side,” with the benefit of assistance in cutting through the red tape of what he described as the “labyrinthine” federal application process. Since 2011, San Antonio has already benefitted from Obama administration place-based grant programs, specifically Promise Neighborhoods and Choice Neighborhoods, to the tune of $53.4 million in grant support.
- Philadelphia’s mayor Michael Nutter has designated the Mantua neighborhood of West Philadelphia for the city’s Promise Zone. Approximately half of the population of Mantua lives below the poverty level and unemployment in the neighborhood runs about 13 percent. Anticipating preferences for other federal programs, Nutter’s chief grants officer, Maari Porter, expressed hope that the city would be able to apply and receive approval for a $30 million Promise Neighborhoods program grant from the Department of Education.
The Obama administration has to be careful, however, about creeping expectations, like Philadelphia’s expectation that a Promise Zone designation will lead to a Promise Neighborhoods grant. The Los Angeles headlines mention say that the city will “receive up to $500m as White House ‘Promise Zone’,” without making it clear that the Promise Zone designation itself actually carries no money with it. The Choctaw designation, covering much of southeastern Oklahoma, seems to have been received by the Choctaw director of grants and development, John Jackson, with more realistic expectations according to reporting by National Public Radio: “No checks from the federal government have been cut yet, according to Jackson. And it’s not clear when they will be. The ‘Promise Zones’ will still have to apply for existing federal grants to receive financial support.”
According to its fact sheet, the White House anticipates significant involvement from nonprofits and foundations in the five Promise Zones. Philadelphia’s program, for example, will develop an education program to be carried out in partnership with Drexel University and the William Penn Foundation to prepare children for careers. The Eastern Kentucky Promise Zone, encompassing eight counties, was actually designed by the Kentucky Highlands Investment Corporation, a nonprofit rural CDC that was created during the early days of the War on Poverty.
Like the reaction of foundations and nonprofits in response to the Promise Neighborhoods program, modeled on the Harlem Children’s Zone initiative, it is easy to anticipate philanthropic excitement with the announcement of this newest version of a place-based, federally incentivized, comprehensive community initiative. But the foundation CCI track record is, like the Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community program, mixed. The “new twist” in the Promise Zones program isn’t immediately evident, since EZs and ECs had an array of tax credits and also promised preferential openness to coordinated grant applications. Perhaps the new twist is that there is really no new money attached to the Promise Zone programs, and Congress hasn’t even taken up the Promise Zones tax credits. Nonprofits in the five Promise Zones cities will be the nation’s eyes and ears to determine if this program really is an advance over previous federal place-based initiatives rather than more—or less—of the same.—Rick Cohen