logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Some Founders Can Remain: Kip Tiernan and Rosie’s Place

Ruth McCambridge
March 21, 2004
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

Kip Tiernan is a founder’s founder. In the last 30 years she has founded Rosie’s Place and the Boston Food Bank, and co-founded the Poor People’s United Fund, Healthcare for the Homeless, the Women’s Fund, and Community Works. At age 77, Kip still works at the Poor People’s United Fund, but calls Rosie’s Place her “home”—the one place she will never leave. Kip was originally in corporate public relations and advertising, and anti-war work in the 1960s gave her a window on how to use her marketing skills for social causes. She has never looked back.

In the early 1970s, Kip observed women passing themselves off as men in order to find shelter in Boston. It was the Catholic Workers movement and Dorothy Day in New York City who influenced her to simply “be there “for homeless people. Respect, listening, and building a community of mutuality became mantras as she went on to found Rosie’s Place in an abandoned supermarket in 1974. She also took another lesson from Dorothy Day—do not take money from “the man.” As a result, a critical philosophical principle of Rosie’s Place, to this day, is to refuse all city, state, and government funding.

The early years at Rosie’s Place were similar to those at many progressive, sheltering organizations of the 1970s. It was volunteer-led with no paid staff during its first four years. People made do with what they had: an abandoned supermarket as a first home (sheltering women anyway, whether zoning allowed it or not) with few program policies except for a highly evolved mission and ethos around how to work with homeless women.

Kip spent the first eight years primarily fundraising, speaking to countless church and social clubs and college groups. She requested funding, clothing, volunteers, and food. She also worked five to six eight-hour shifts per week, talking with and listening to the women who came to Rosie’s Place—a classic founder, working endless hours to make the ship sail.

Kip is most publicly identified with Rosie’s Place, but she has never been its director or even a paid staff member. She was its founder, newsletter and marketing coordinator, shift volunteer, and continuous big-vision thinker; and today her “formal” role is on the board of directors. But she never wanted to manage the organization. Kip says she feels lucky—for her life, for the partners who have helped and supported her, for the women of Rosie’s Place who have both taught her and provided her truest community. This feeling of being a part of a community versus “owning an organization,” as she puts it, most directly reflects Kip’s self-awareness and ability to share leadership, characteristics that have been key to the organization’s openness to her ongoing involvement.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

What is remarkable in this story is that Rosie’s Place has been flexible enough to allow for change, which has included different organizational structures as well as considerable growth (from an all-volunteer staff to a 50-plus paid staff with 1000 volunteers—a $3.1 million-dollar operation)—and yet still maintain its relationship with its conceptual and spiritual founder. It’s not for every group, but it has worked at Rosie’s Place.

There were several classic bumps along the way in the early years (people leaving over fundamental arguments about whether or not to take government funding, and later on about the organizational structure itself). Kip doesn’t maintain she was an angel through these times, but she was able to persevere to the other side of the struggle and to work with and accept changes when they came, and when they were appropriate. She is a self-described opinionated, big-picture thinker, but one who also credits many, many people with the success of Rosie’s Place, and who recognizes the importance of giving management authority to several excellent executive directors—particularly the current director, Sue Marsh and her predecessor, Julie Brandlen.

The lesson we can learn from Kip is to know where our strengths lie—but to remain humble in our need for others to make something whole. It also helps to be able to identify the strengths that others need to bring to the table. Openness to others attracts good people with complementary strengths. Finally, you have to have the sense to not micro-manage those who are willing to partner with you, particularly in the areas where they bring expertise. When asked why she thinks she’s lasted, Kip said:

There is no such thing as a lone leader. You cannot do it by yourself; nor should you feel ownership over what you do as much as you should relish being a part of the community created by the interdependence of things.

  • Her perspective is not static: “What worked 30 years ago, doesn’t necessarily work today.”
  • Let go of detail… Even if Kip sees things she would do differently (which she admits to, even 30 years later), she lets go of the small stuff and encourages staff members to find their way.
  • Staying true to the big stuff… A founder who finds a way to remain, while letting an organization grow, can gift the organization with the presence of a living, founding ethos. In Kip’s case, she’ll let go of the details but she shines the light on those founding principles that she put in place 30 years ago: respect for homeless women, support of women to be who they are, the importance of volunteerism, and the importance of not relying on funding that will negatively affect the mission. Kip calls this the “articulation of things that shouldn’t change. “

The balance of knowing your strengths and weaknesses and having enough perspective to let go of the small stuff, while being a standard bearer for the critical organizational principles, is a good lesson for those founders hoping to remain affiliated with organizations they care about. By the same token, organizations need to be flexible and create roles for their special visionaries or keepers of the flame. The board and staff of Rosie’s Place have figured this out along the way.

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Policy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.