logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Reimagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • Newsletters
  • NPQ Online Events
  • Leading Edge Membership

To Some, Summerfest CEO’s Pay Seen as Bummerfest

Rob Meiksins
March 22, 2013

Summerfest

March 20, 2013; Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

In a recent newswire on nonprofit executive compensation, NPQ pondered what should be considered “excessive or too low” and asked how we know the answer to such questions. Our recommendation was that organizations look at more than one measure, as suggested by Linda Lampkin in her 2006 Nonprofit Quarterly article, “You’re Paying What? How to Set Executive Compensation.” That article might be needed in Milwaukee, where a controversy is swirling regarding the salary of Don Smiley, the CEO of a major music festival, Summerfest, who has seen his total compensation package increase from $280,864 in 2005 to more than $772,575 in 2011. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel columnist Daniel Bice puts this figure into context by noting that it is more than the salary of President Barack Obama and more than the combined salaries of Milwaukee’s mayor, county executive, sheriff, and police chief.

According to Bice, at issue is not just the size of the compensation package but also the level (or lack) of transparency in the process of determining it. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett is calling for the full board of the Milwaukee World Festival, the nonprofit that oversees Summerfest, to consider Smiley’s compensation in open session; in the past, it has been determined by a small personnel committee in a private session. Milwaukee World Festival has a 26-member board of directors. Ted Kellner, the executive chairman of Fiduciary Management Inc., is president of the board and chairs the four-person personnel committee charged with setting Smiley’s salary. Kellner says that it is quite common for nonprofits to have such discussions in committees as opposed to with the full board, but he adds that if a motion similar to Barrett’s proposal came from the floor, he would have the board consider it.

Should the salary of the CEO be discussed in open session, or is that an invitation for people to start needlessly bickering? Is Smiley being paid way too much or, as Kellner points out, is he simply getting what he would receive if he did the same job in the private sector? Smiley has reportedly overseen many improvements to the festival’s facilities during his tenure and has negotiated a long-term lease with Milwaukee. However, Summerfest attendance, which some may consider the ultimate measure of a CEO’s success in this type of role, has not returned to the one million attendees mark that it hit in 2001 and 2002. To what extent do such bottom line results play into the compensation equation? –Rob Meiksins

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Rob Meiksins

Rob has served in the nonprofit sector for over 30 years in roles ranging from intern to program manager, executive director to board director, and consultant. Starting out in professional theatre in New York City, Rob moved to Milwaukee to work with Milwaukee Rep as the dramaturg. Later, he started to work more and more helping people and organizations in the nonprofit sector articulate, and then take the next step towards their vision. Currently he is working on a new effort to establish an intentional process for nonprofits to identify their capacity-building needs and then learn about and implement the tools that will help. Ideally this is a partnership between nonprofits, consultants, and the philanthropic community to strengthen the sector we all see as critical.

More about: Board Governance
See comments

You might also like
The Meaningful Reset: Designing Nonprofits to Survive Board-Staff Conflict
Kristin Lincoln
Using AI for Fundraising Still Requires Human Strategy
Rochelle Jerry
AI in the Nonprofit Sector Is a Question of Governance, Not Just Technology
James A. Lomastro
Seat at the Table, No Vote in the Box: Finding the Governance “Sweet Spot”
Cheretta Clerkley
Does the Executive Director Belong in Board Executive Committee Meetings?
Jan Masaoka
How to Handle Founder’s Syndrome with Grace
Marian Urquilla

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
May 14, 2:00 pm ET

Equitable Compensation in Practice

A New Values-Aligned Toolkit & Discussion Guide

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
May 28, 2:00 pm ET

Learn Out Loud

Revisiting Maurice Mitchell's "Building Resilient Organizations"

Register

    
You might also like
Two women stand in front of each other and face away from the camera. Between them, they press their hands together against a yellow frame.
The Meaningful Reset: Designing Nonprofits to Survive...
Kristin Lincoln
An illustration of a robot hand holding up and supporting a floating human brain.
Using AI for Fundraising Still Requires Human Strategy
Rochelle Jerry
A robot hand reaching slightly downward to touch a human hand, representing the human influence on AI and vise versa.
AI in the Nonprofit Sector Is a Question of Governance, Not...
James A. Lomastro

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.