logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

A Good Nonprofit Decision Badly Made is No Good at All

Martin Levine
October 26, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
“Behind Closed Doors,” CLenses

October 23, 2018; Chicago Tribune

The Old Town School of Folk Music, a storied member of Chicago’s nonprofit community, announced this week it was selling a landmark building to help create a much-needed endowment fund. The reactions from its students, instructors, and community underscore the difficult questions organizational leaders face as they plan: When and how should an organizational board share its thinking about organizational change and engage their stakeholders? How is it best to balance the efficient decision-making a closed-door process can offer against the messier and more political nature of a wider process?

Old Town’s board of directors seem to have made a very rational business decision. As described by Block Club Chicago, “The reason the school’s leadership has revisited the idea of selling the Lincoln Park location more than once is because it’s one of the school’s more valuable assets. Last week, the board decided the current real estate market in Lincoln Park makes it the perfect time to put the Armitage address on the market.”

The school described the sale as “the beginning of a new chapter.”

Operating a nonprofit organization, like Old Town, which does not have sufficient endowment resources is risky and makes planning for the future and keeping pace with community change difficult if not impossible. Old Town CEO Beau Graves described the board’s thinking to Block Club Chicago:

We always thought we’d hang on to it since it kept serving students and we own it outright. So, it was cost effective to keep the Lincoln Park location open. But the school has now determined, having gone for 60 years without an endowment fund, it made sense to secure the future of the school in perpetuity by creating one.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

“Once that money is set into an endowment that is forever, unless the board decides to change the charter,” Graves said. “With a $10 million endowment we can secure between $400,000 and $500,000 for the school on an annual basis, which will be useful to make sure the school can develop new programs and generate the same community that it has always had.”

If market conditions indicate that now’s the time to convert one of its few assets into enough cash to jumpstart an endowment campaign, this may be a necessary and timely step. Old Town’s leadership decided it was best to reach this decision without engaging their wider world. Beau Graves told the Chicago Tribune that “prior to that decision, I didn’t feel comfortable taking this issue into the larger Old Town School community.” The risk in doing that is that key supporters who will remain important in the reconfigured organization will be alienated because they feel ignored.

Almost immediately following the announcement of the decision, protests were raised. According to the Tribune, “Rich Gordon, a longtime student of the school, posted a petition online titled ‘Save the Old Town School of Folk Music.’ In the petition, posted Tuesday afternoon, Gordon alleged mismanagement and called for a change in leadership.”

The petition, which has already had almost 3,000 signers, asks for the broader engagement by the Old Town School community that might have occurred before the decision was finalized: “Provide more transparency about the decision to sell the Armitage building—give us evidence that the sale is part of a coherent plan to restore the School’s financial health, not just a desperate short-term fix…Create some kind of student council or advisory board to serve as a forum for discussion of school policies and to provide a conduit for student input to the administration.”

A similar request was voiced by one of the school instructors, who told the Tribune, “I’m suggesting…they reach back to the teachers and let them—if that decision to sell the building is the right decision—let the teachers participate in that decision. They’ve been asking all along to have a say in the future of the school.”

NPQ has long recognized the wisdom of a more engaged and participatory style of organizational governance. As Chao Guo quotes, “It is the responsibility of local nonprofits…to have governance mechanisms that can convene the individuals they are established to serve with other stakeholders, engage them in dialogue with the organization and one another, develop a collective dream of the future or vision of what can be accomplished, and develop strategies that will take the group from here to there.” Having chosen to not engage early and often, Old Town runs the risk of having an important decision backfire. Deciding to change established patterns and give up facilities that have served long and well is never easy for those most directly affected. Overcoming their concerns takes time, but will be even harder when they are faced with a fait accompli.—Martin Levine

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Martin Levine

Martin Levine is a Principal at Levine Partners LLP, a consulting group focusing on organizational change and improvement, realigning service systems to allow them to be more responsive and effective. Before that, he served as the CEO of JCC Chicago, where he was responsible for the development of new facilities in response to the changing demography of the Metropolitan Jewish Community. In addition to his JCC responsibilities, Mr. Levine served as a consultant on organizational change and improvement to school districts and community organizations. Mr. Levine has published several articles on change and has presented at numerous conferences on this subject. A native of New York City, Mr. Levine is a graduate of City College of New York (BS in Biology) and Columbia University (MSW). He has trained with the Future Search and the Deming Institute.

More about: nonprofit real estateBoard GovernanceNonprofit NewsTransparency

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Are Your Organization and Its Board “Access Able”?
Katherine Schneider
Navigating Succession: Four Exiting CEO Mindsets
Aparna Anand Joshi, Donald C. Hambrick and Jiyeon Kang
Salary Transparency: One Organization’s Story
Jeanne Bell
Nonprofits, Transparency, and Staff Support in 2020: Three Case Studies
Kori Kanayama
Survey Finds Vast Shortfall in Diversity Efforts of Leading Boston Nonprofits
Steve Dubb
The Evolutionary Problem of Art Behemoths in the Pandemic
Ruth McCambridge

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.