logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Free Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

As Feds Try to Place Refugees in Texas, Resettlement Nonprofits Hold Firm

Ruth McCambridge
September 23, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
refugees-welcome-grafitti
Refugees Welcome / Nicolas Vigier

September 21, 2016; Texas Tribune

As readers of the NPQ nonprofit newswire may remember, last year, Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, tried to resist any resettlement of Syrian refugees in that state by threatening local resettlement nonprofits and suing the federal government. Now, in response to the Obama administration’s declared goal of increasing by 30 percent the number of refugees to be resettled in the U.S. next year, Abbott is once again threatening not to participate unless the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement “unconditionally approves” a state plan that would require additional vetting:

Despite multiple requests by the state of Texas, the federal government lacks the capability or the will to distinguish the dangerous from the harmless, and Texas will not be an accomplice to such dereliction of duty to the American people.

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Federal officials, of course, have said that the current vetting process, which can take up to two years, is more than sufficient. “This model for refugee resettlement will continue in Texas,” a spokesperson for the federal Administration for Children and Families said in a statement.

Reportedly, in negotiating refugee resettlement plans for 2017, Texas officials have already rejected a State Department proposal to increase the number of refugees resettled in Texas by 25 percent over the 7,633 resettled in 2016. Texas state officials are not allowed to exclude refugees; they may only refuse to participate, in which case the federal government can direct money that would have flowed through the state directly to resettlement nonprofits under the U.S. Refugee Act of 1980. This would require the designation of a state refugee coordinator to disburse funding—a provision now active in six states.

The nonprofits that held steady through last November’s defunding threats continue to do so. “Providing security and refuge are not mutually exclusive objectives,” said Aaron Rippenkroeger, CEO of Refugee Services of Texas. “Texas has accomplished both objectives for decades.”—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Nonprofit Newsnonprofit-municipal relationsPolicytreatment of refugees

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb
We Owe You Nothing: The Movement to Cancel Student Debt Gains Ground
Rithika Ramamurthy
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb Plutocracy
Alan Davis
Green New Deal or Stale Old Tax-Break Scam? Getting Electric Vehicle Incentives Right
Greg LeRoy
Goodbye “Race Neutrality”—The Case for Race-Conscious Economic Policy
Dedrick Asante-Muhammad
Graduate Student Workers Are in the Frontline of the Growing Labor Movement
Rithika Ramamurthy

NPQ_Summer_2022

Upcoming Webinars

July 14th, 2 pm ET

Combating Disinformation and Misinformation in 21st-Century Social Movements

Register Now
Group Created with Sketch.
July 28th, 2 pm ET

Changing the Subject

Boards As Social Movement Spaces

Register Now
You might also like
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of...
Steve Dubb
We Owe You Nothing: The Movement to Cancel Student Debt...
Rithika Ramamurthy
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb...
Alan Davis

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.