logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Potential for Voter Intimidation Attempts Looms as Election Draws Nearer

Ruth McCambridge
November 3, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Polling Station
Referendum / Kevin Doncaster

November 2, 2016; CNN Politics

Even as Donald Trump soapboxes about the potential for a “rigged election,” Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center warns that “the possibility of violence on or around Election Day is very real.”

Potok is responding here to promises from white nationalist groups to bring a show of strength to polls, where a large minority population will be voting.

“Many polling locations are in schools, and black schools are so disorderly that pretty much any official-looking white person with a clipboard can gain access to them ahead of time and set up a hidden camera. You don’t really ever even have to speak with an adult. Simply walk in like you belong there and no one even asks you why you are there.”—From alt-right website TheRightStuff.Biz.

Though others call these groups “serial exaggerators,” that doesn’t mean they won’t be able to mobilize the odd “loner” whipped into a frenzy by the drone of hate speech. As Potok points out, “Donald Trump has been telling his supporters for weeks and weeks and weeks now that they are about to have the election stolen from them by evil forces on behalf of the elites.”

Meanwhile, in more formal settings, a federal judge has scheduled a hearing for Friday in New Jersey to examine the RNC’s activities in promoting and organizing poll watching. Such activity may violate a consent decree put into effect in the 1980s after the RNC was charged with intimidating voters in predominately African-American precincts in New Jersey. (Reportedly, the RNC hired off-duty police officers to stand at polling places with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, and the consent decree was part of the settlement.)

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

“The RNC has coordinated with the Trump campaign in its unlawful ‘ballot security’ efforts,” DNC lawyer Angelo J. Genova argued in the lawsuit. “Trump’s running mate, Gov. Mike Pence has publicly confirmed that both the RNC and the Trump campaign are working directly with state Republican parties on so-called ‘ballot security measures.’”

Democratic lawyers have also filed lawsuits charging voter intimidation in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 in Nevada, Ohio, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. The court documents state, “Trump has made an escalating series of statements, often racially tinged, suggesting that his supporters should go to particular precincts on Election Day and intimidate voters.”

“This planned course of intimidation,” they argued, “violates the Voting Rights Act.”

Richard Hasen, who runs the Election Law Blog, doubts that any court will issue a vague order to stop “voter intimidation,” as requested. “But the suits will first bring publicity to the activities, and second get these parties on record stating that they do not plan on engaging in voter intimidation, which itself could be useful in the event of problems on Election Day,” he wrote.

Potok suggests that the more open the far right is about its voter suppression tactics, the more resistance will be built. “If on the morning of Election Day it turns out that we have white supremacists standing around looking threatening at polling places, I think it would arouse anger,” he said. “People would vote just to prove they’re not being intimidated by these radical racists.”—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: voter suppression voting rightsDonald TrumpElectoral fraud and campaign hackingNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
What’s at Stake in the Wave of Voter Suppression Bills?
Carole Levine and Steve Dubb
Republican-Led State Legislatures Rush to Restrict Voting Rights
Carole Levine
Black-led Georgia Nonprofits Protect Democracy
Beth Couch
Transfer of Power: The Deeper Shift We Need
Crystal Hayling
Undermining Elections via Death Threats, Lawsuits, and Voter Fraud Accusations
Carole Levine
For the Birds! 1,500 Fraudulent Votes Finally Surface—in the Wrong Race
Ruth McCambridge

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.