logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Grassroots Fundraising Journal
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • About
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Featured Articles
  • Webinars
    • Free Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate

Donor Premiums Are No Substitute for Relationship-Building, Study Confirms

Sheela Nimishakavi
November 9, 2018
Share21
Tweet2
Email
Share
“Two Montblanc light brown leather luggage tags,” Antefixus 21

November 8, 2018; The Conversation

Over the years, there has been much research on the practice of offering gifts or incentives to donors in return for donations, and the results have been mixed. Some research indicates that a large gift could increase the frequency of donations by as much as 75 percent. Other work indicates that offering donor premiums isn’t worth it for the nonprofit: A 2008 study of giving to a national park in Costa Rica says, “The total effect of giving a gift is positive but small, and taking the cost of the gift into account, it is far from profitable. And a Yale-based study NPQ covered in 2012 found the effect was decidedly negative when looked at over time:

Results indicate that although people expect that the offer of thank-you gifts will increase donations, such offers actually reduce charitable donations. This effect was obtained across a wide variety of charities and gifts types, regardless of whether the donations were hypothetical or real, the gift was desirable or undesirable, the charity was familiar or unfamiliar, or the gift was more or less valuable. Moreover, such patterns cannot solely be explained in terms of inferences about the charity’s quality (e.g., either their efficacy or current wealth), the undesirability of the gift itself, or simple anchoring effects.

Given this lack of clarity, Texas A&M researchers set out to answer this question on their own home turf. They used the Texas A&M alumni association, a group of 140,000 individuals, as their experimental cohort. These potential donors were split into groups at random:

A control group received no gift offer. One group got a leather A&M-branded luggage tag in the mailing requesting a donation while another group received a plastic luggage tag.

Four groups received a conditional offer: a luggage tag in response to their donation. One group merely received the offer. Another group had an identical solicitation with related wording on the outside of the envelope. This tested whether prospective donors could be made more likely to open the mailing. The other two had the option to decline the tag or, to ensure our phrasing wasn’t driving the results, the option of receiving it.

Four of these groups hovered around the same response rate, between 0.44 percent–0.49 percent: control, conditional gift, conditional gift with opt-in, and conditional gift with opt-out. There was a slight jump in response rate to 0.55 percent for the group that received the conditional gift with no envelope text. The two groups that had the highest response rates are those who received the plastic unconditional gift (0.60 percent) and the leather unconditional gift (1.02 percent).

This data suggests that donors were encouraged to give when they received an unconditional gift, and the nicer the gift, the more they responded. But, in terms of how much funding the organization raised from the campaign, the plastic luggage tag had the best return, given the cost to the nonprofit to produce the leather tags. Still, the plastic tags only raised 40 cents on average, whereas the mailings that included no gifts raised an average of 39 cents.

Still, there are other reasons why a nonprofit might choose to use donor premiums. One would be to simply stand out in potential donors’ mailboxes. Particularly during the end of the year when donors receive an onslaught of appeals, the ability to stand out amongst the pack could mean the difference between a large donation and no donation. Moreover, if an organization can encourage a donor to give once, retaining that donor would be more cost- effective than trying to acquire new donors. But, unless an organization has a solid plan for stewarding donors and has the capacity to build these relationships, sending expensive donor premiums could actually cost the organization even more.

As enticing as donor premiums may seem, as a tactic, this reeks of lazy fundraising. The most cost-effective and rewarding fundraising practices are those that build stronger relationships with donors, not those that coerce a donor to open an envelope in the hope that they respond. Furthermore, as we look to the future and stewarding the next generation of donors, data indicates that swag items may actually turn away potential donors. Rather, the younger generations are looking to become more involved in the organizations they support with their “time, treasure, and talent.” Offering unique experiences and building strong relationships will be the key to acquiring and retaining the new generation of donors.— Sheela Nimishakavi

Share21
Tweet2
Email
Share

About The Author
Sheela Nimishakavi

Sheela Nimishakavi is a nonprofit finance and operations professional with a passion for creating socially just and inclusive communities. She has held senior management positions at several community based organizations addressing access to healthcare and services for persons with disabilities, currently serving as the Director of Operations of the Brain Injury Association of Virginia.After working in the nonprofit field for over a decade and seeing many organizations struggle with the administrative requirements of running a nonprofit, Sheela founded ThirdSuite, a consulting firm that offers nonprofit administrative services and trainings to help organizations increase their capacity and further their mission.Sheela received an MA/MPH in Health Policy and Management from Boston University School of Public Health, and a BS in Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior from the University of California, Davis. She currently serves on the boards of the Central Virginia Grant Professionals Association and Empowering People for Inclusive Communities.

Related
“Bright Spots” Report a Goldmine for Nonprofits about Successful Fundraising at the Grassroots
By Ruth McCambridge
September 11, 2020
Do Donor Premiums Work? It Depends
By Niduk D'Souza
January 14, 2020
A CEO’s Stakeholder Plea Calls on the Non-Cash Capital of Nonprofits
By Ruth McCambridge
December 11, 2019
Study on Overhead and Donors Suggests “Mum’s the Word”
By Ruth McCambridge and Sarah Miller
November 27, 2019
It’s September: Do You Know Where Your Donors Are? First Half of 2019 Shows Donor Drop
By Sarah Miller and Ruth McCambridge
September 11, 2019
Re-engaging and Recruiting Donors: One Flashy Model with Replicable Elements
By Ruth McCambridge
September 11, 2019

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 21, 2 pm ET

Remaking the Economy

Health, Racial Disparities, and Economic Justice

other posts by The Author
Meals on Wheels East Texas Warned to End CEO as Board Chair...
By Sheela Nimishakavi and Ruth McCambridge
April 11, 2019
The Nonprofit Sector’s Role in Promoting Sustainable...
By Sheela Nimishakavi
January 11, 2019
Top US Schools Fail to Provide Adequate Mental Health Care...
By Sheela Nimishakavi
December 19, 2018
CYNDI SUAREZ
The Nonprofit Racial Leadership Gap: Flipping the Lens
Powerful Interests Seek to Make Puerto Rico the Hong Kong of the...
Moving Beyond the Privilege of White Tears
logo
Donate