logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Nonprofit Newswire | Troubles in a Landmark Housing Effort

Ruth McCambridge
July 20, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

July 19, 2010; Source: New York Times | In the mid-nineties New York City owned 8,950 buildings that had been seized for tax arrears. These contained 110,000 housing units. Many, left to decay for years, were painful blights on their neighborhoods. The city offered these, in a remarkable and massive redevelopment effort, for sale to for-profit developers, tenants and nonprofits. A small portion of these—442 to be exact—have fallen back into debt and disrepair.

They are also once again behind in taxes and fees to the tune of $140 million. The buildings are located from the South Bronx to Central Brooklyn. This article points to a number of nonprofit organizations among those who have essentially lost control of their holdings. It describes, in particular, the declining conditions in one 42-unit building owned by the Bronx Heights Neighborhood Development Corporation.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

With $3.7 million dollars in tax arrears and unpaid municipal fees on this and eight other nearby buildings BHNDC owns, the city plans to institute foreclosure proceedings on its entire portfolio and on 10 other buildings in this historic grouping. There appear to be some extenuating circumstances at work. BHNDC has been without an executive for years and appears to be suffering from a warring board, leading some to wonder why the city did not intervene. Additionally the article cites sharp increases in municipal fees that make the finances of the buildings difficult.

Other housing activists are quick to point to the relatively small proportion of buildings in failure. “It [NYC] took 100,000 slumlord units and changed them into 100,000 units that catalyzed the redevelopment and revitalization of tens of neighborhoods around the city,” Benjamin Dulchin, executive director of the Association for Neighborhood and Housing Development, which represents dozens of housing groups, told the Times. The proliferation of troubled buildings is lamentable, Mr. Dulchin said, but it is “a minor part in what has been an overwhelmingly successful public policy story.”—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Nonprofit NewsPolicies and Laws

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
A School-Based Philanthropy Project Turns Controversial: Is There a Policy in Place?
Martin Levine
Conflict of Interest Policies: Not Just More Nonprofit Documents
Jeannie Fox
Politics and Science: A Dangerous Brew
Martin Levine
Don’t Tread on Us: Keep Toxic Partisanship Away from Nonprofit Missions
Tim Delaney
Senate GOP Delays Healthcare Vote for Sausage-making Time
Michael Wyland
War Hero Gubernatorial Candidate Faces Formidable Foe in the IRS
Jim Schaffer

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.