logo logo
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

When People Fight to Get on Your Nonprofit Board, It’s Not Always a Positive

Ruth McCambridge
May 1, 2017
“Josh Romney” by Gage Skidmore

April 27, 2017; Salt Lake Tribune

There are many kinds of nonprofit boards, and some are, let’s face it, more effective than others—and less angst-filled. And, as we recently discussed at the UMKC Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership’s biennial Nonprofit Governance Conference, there is less knowledge than there should be about what kinds of problems and strengths come with what kinds of boards. We will try to change that with our colleagues from that conference over the next year, but in the meantime, here is a story that’s typical of some kinds of highly politicized boards.

In Utah, where a decision has evidently been made to bring together all homeless services under one “collective impact” umbrella, the “squabbling” over available board seats at Shelter the Homeless has come to the attention of the local press. There are four open spots available on what will be an expanded 15-member board.

[Salt Lake County Mayor Ben] McAdams said up until now there’s been “no formal mechanism” for coordination and collaboration between the city, state and county on homelessness issues—which is why the county’s Collective Impact on Homelessness Committee has called for a “backbone” organization to coordinate services and hold service providers accountable to goals in the future.

“We want to make sure we have the ability to shape the services to our (goals) set by Collective Impact,” McAdams said.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The nonprofit will oversee a valleywide network of homeless services, including three new 200- to 300-bed shelters. They will also select the providers who will run those new shelters and presumably have influence in policy making in areas that affect homeless people.

The groups say the board should be made up of representatives of health care, philanthropy, faith-based organizations, housing developments, and the general business community. But among those who have expressed interest in those board seats is Josh Romney, developer son of Mitt Romney, who’s said to be an aspirant for the office of governor or senator. His association with the Pioneer Park Coalition, which pushed to close a shelter and a permanent homeless encampment in the area, has one community group speaking out. Tim Funk of Crossroads Urban Center says, “There are people in the city and in the county who are a hell of a lot more qualified, in any way, either personally or professionally, than Josh Romney ever would be.” And he is clearly not alone in that opinion.

In a March email obtained by the Tribune in response to a records request, Shaleane Gee, the county’s director of special projects, wrote to Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams after a meeting that “the volume of personally negative emails/texts I get, especially from staff, whenever Josh Romney says anything at all is really disheartening. Most of it is very personal in nature.”

The paper also reports that a closed session discussion of the current board took up the topic of the appropriate role of elected officials on the board. These kinds of boards, where representatives come in to advocate for or represent a distinct group of stakeholders rather than to advocate for the mission as a whole, can be very tough creatures to get moving in a single cohesive direction.—Ruth McCambridge

About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Board DevelopmentBoard GovernanceNonprofit News

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
How the Wealthy Took Control of Nonprofits
Ananda Valenzuela
Cultivating a Liberatory Board
Ananda Valenzuela
A New Framework for Governance Duties: Loving Accountability and Abundant Resourcing
Ananda Valenzuela
How Boards Can Confidently Assess Executive Pay
Isaiah Thompson
Nonprofit Boards Remain Overwhelmingly White—Here’s How to Change That
Ted Siefer
Women of Color Leaders: Shifting Power Dynamics within the Board–Executive Relationship
Tiloma Jayasinghe

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
July 24th, 2:00 pm ET

Organizing in Divided Times

The Relational Infrastructure We Need to Protect Democracy

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
September 24th-25th, 2:00 pm ET

Advanced QuickBooks for Nonprofits

Expert Guidance for Experienced QuickBooks Users

Register

    
You might also like
US Capitol Building
Trump Budget Bill Spells Trouble for Nonprofits
Isaiah Thompson
A group of about two dozen students, many wearing blue shirts, walk in the rain in front of the US House of Representatives.
How Nonprofits and Activists Can Oppose Trump’s “Big...
Matthew Rozsa
Conservatives Attack Nonprofits on Capitol Hill
Isaiah Thompson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.