logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Trump Adviser Double-dipping from Breitbart and Nonprofit Foundation

Michael Wyland
November 28, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Stephen-Bannon
Steve Bannon / Don Irvine

November 23, 2016; Washington Post

Steve Bannon, the executive chairman at conservative news site Breitbart News Network (before going on leave in August) and newly appointed senior adviser (some say co-chief of staff) to President-elect Trump, has been receiving compensation from the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), a small Florida-based foundation established by Bannon in 2012. Two other GAI employees are also identified as receiving compensation from the foundation while simultaneously employed elsewhere.

The six-figure compensation reported on GAI’s 2012-2014 Form 990 returns raises serious questions of private inurement and excessive compensation. GAI appears to be paying full-time or near full-time compensation to three people with other apparent full-time employment. In addition, GAI receives much of its funding from a single private foundation whose sole officer is also a GAI board member.

Form 990 filings on GuideStar indicate that Bannon received between $81,000 in 2012 and $100,000 a year in 2013 and 2014 for 30 hours a week as the chairman of GAI while simultaneously working full time at Breitbart. It’s unclear how Bannon could work three-quarters time at GAI while simultaneously running Breitbart. In addition, GAI paid more than $200,000 for advertising on Breitbart’s web site from 2012 to 2014.

The Washington Post article expresses concern about the conservative nature of GAI and its donors, as well as its publications, which are critical of elected officials, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Peter Schweizer, GAI’s president, is the author of Clinton Cash, a 2015 book (and movie) tracing the transactions and relationships involving Bill and Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and foreign governments and individuals. The following statement is included in the acknowledgements at the end of Clinton Cash:

The Government Accountability Institute has benefitted from terrific leadership in our little more than three years of existence. This includes our chairman and CEO Stephen K. Bannon, as well as our board of directors….I want to say a special thanks to those who have supported our research over the past couple of years, which has offended both Republicans and Democrats in Washington.

The GAI website’s homepage features post-election media appearances by Schweizer outlining potential business conflicts of interest facing Donald Trump as he prepares to become the next president. No mention is made of Steve Bannon’s roles at Breitbart and GAI. A spokeswoman for GAI says Bannon stepped down in August 2016.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

A statement from GAI’s spokesperson said:

The Government Accountability Institute’s [GAI] track record investigating Republicans is clear and undeniable. Republicans like John Boehner, Spencer Bachus, Roy Blunt, Dennis Hastert, Ron Paul, Jeb Bush, Saxby Chambliss, Ander Crenshaw, Ray LaHood, Richard Lugar, Marco Rubio, Jerry Lewis, Bill Young, Dave Camp, Tom DeLay, and the National Republican Congressional Committee have all been the subjects of serious GAI reports and books.

It’s not clear whether being bipartisan in investigating possible corruption sufficiently addresses the issue advocacy as opposed to political campaign intervention test applied to 501(c)(3) public charities like GAI. It’s also unclear how the IRS (and, ultimately, the federal courts) would assess the level of partisan political activity when reviewing investigative materials that slam a candidate but never explicitly argue against voting for them, or voting in the alternative for their opponent.

In addition to his full-time employment at GAI, Schweizer is also listed on the firm’s website as a principal of Oval Office Writers, a for-profit limited liability company (LLC) that he co-founded with Mark Theissen in 2009.

Another potential conflict involves Wynton Hall, identified by GAI as a full-time (40 hours a week) communications strategist. GAI’s base compensation to Hall was $101,461 in 2012, $145,231 in 2013, and $175,000 in 2014. However, he is also managing editor at Breitbart, with significant editorial demands. When Hall was promoted to managing editor in 2013, Bannon said, “Having a 24/7 editorial team focused on the site, coupled with senior editors generating content, allows us to continue Andrew’s legacy of waging ‘fights that matter.’” He is also identified as a senior strategist at Oval Office Writers on the firm’s website.

One of GAI’s board members, Rebekah Mercer, is also the sole officer of the Mercer Family Foundation, which is funded solely by Robert Mercer, a hedge fund billionaire and Rebekah’s father. Mercer Family Foundation gave $1 million to GAI in 2013 and 2014. These gifts represent approximately 44 percent of GAI’s total expenses in those two years. Mercer’s role with her family’s foundation is not mentioned in GAI’s most recent Form 990 return.

It appears that the Government Accountability Institute, using money from major donors like the Mercer Family Foundation’s Robert Mercer and his administrator/daughter Rebekah Mercer, provided significant income—using charitable gifts—to Bannon while he was employed full-time at Breitbart, to Schweizer while employed at Oval Office Writers, and Hall while employed at both Breitbart and Oval Office Writers. Did GAI receive fair value for compensation paid, or was the compensation excessive and place the individuals in a private inurement situation in regard to their respective relationships to GAI? With Bannon about to become a senior White House aide, perhaps the Government Accountability Institute should investigate itself.—Michael Wyland

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Michael Wyland

Michael L. Wyland currently serves as an editorial advisory board member and consulting editor to The Nonprofit Quarterly, with more than 400 articles published since 2012. A partner in the consulting firm of Sumption & Wyland, he has more than thirty years of experience in corporate and government public policy, management, and administration.

More about: conflicts of interest nonprofit board problemsBoard GovernanceNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Are Your Organization and Its Board “Access Able”?
Katherine Schneider
Navigating Succession: Four Exiting CEO Mindsets
Aparna Anand Joshi, Donald C. Hambrick and Jiyeon Kang
Survey Finds Vast Shortfall in Diversity Efforts of Leading Boston Nonprofits
Steve Dubb
Network Governance as an Empowerment Tool
Blythe Butler and Sami Berger
Otto Bremer’s 3 Paid Trustees Face State Charges of Violating Their Trustee Role
Marian Conway
“Diversify Your Board or Else!” Nonprofits Need a Standard, Too
Martin Levine

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.