Civic Organization Launches Foundation for South Korean “Comfort Women”

Print Share on LinkedIn More
The_Allied_Reoccupation_of_the_Andaman_Islands-Comfort-Women

By Lemon A E (Sergeant), No 9 Army Film & Photographic Unit [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

June 9, 2016; Japan Times and the Korea Herald

“Comfort women” were women and girls forced into sexual slavery by Japanese forces during the Second World War. According to testimonies, young women were abducted from their homes or persuaded with promises of better work or pay. It is estimated that up to 200,000 women, mostly from Korea, were victims of this misconduct. Now, more than 70 years since the end of the Second World War, many victims are reaching old age, making this an increasingly time sensitive issue if they are to receive compensation or an apology.

Of the 42 women that survive, 29 filed a constitutional appeal in March 2015, stating that their basic rights were violated by the December 28th agreement between Seoul and Tokyo. Under this agreement, the Japanese Prime Minister offered an apology and pledged 1 billion yen ($9 million USD) to set up a new foundation with the aim of helping former victims of wartime slavery.

Though it has yet to be set up, the government-backed foundation has been countered by the Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan, who claim that the agreement does not reflect the victims’ true interests. The rival Foundation for Justice and Remembrance for the Issue of Military Sexual Slavery is headed by Chi Eun-hee, who served as Korean Minister of Gender Equality and Family in the early 2000s.

South Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman Cho June-hyuck declined to comment on the launch of the rival foundation, stating only, “It’s not appropriate to comment on a private group’s activities.” The head of the newly created government preparation committee, Kim Tae-hyun, stated, “The organizations should reconsider (their opposition), from the point that the average age of the survivors is 89.4, and we don’t know when they will pass away. Isn’t it the humane thing for them to let go of remorse, accept the apology, and take financial support?”

It is unclear as yet as to what the activities of each foundation will look like, and whether the rival foundation will continue to operate without the assistance of government support or grant funding.—Hannah Butler

  • LtUhura

    This is an interesting article. However, I’m not fully convinced. For example, why then would the Japanese Prime Minister offer an apology and pledged 1 billion yen to the women? I wonder if the truth isn’t somewhere in between. Regardless, maybe both sides can agree that the economic and social systems work against Women — making them more easily abused. These systems (and the culture running along side them) are mostly run by Men in high places and injustice and hardship is made worse in war times.

    • Hyung-Sung Kim

      Yes, you are right. Men from both countries caused suffering for women. As the article I provided says, the Japanese military (Japanese men) was partially responsible because its invasion into China and Southeast Asia did create the demand for comfort women. But Korean women weren’t coerced by the Japanese military. The Korean men (comfort station owners) capitalized on the demand, recruited women, operated comfort stations and made lots of money. Japanese Prime Minister apologized for Japan’s role (creating the demand for comfort women) which indirectly caused women’s suffering. Instead of trying to place the entire blame on Japan, South Korea should admit its complicity and stop blaming Japan for everything.