logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Charges of “Tragedy Capitalism” and the 9/11 Museum’s Response

Ruth McCambridge
May 30, 2014

9/11

May 28, 2014; Wall Street Journal

Sometimes, NPQ is surprised at the defensiveness we see on the part of charity institutions that are criticized by their stakeholders. It is a little like the old adage about denial making political scandal matter—just say you were off base and get on with it!

Last week, NPQ reported on criticisms of the 9/11 Museum’s gift shop. Some thought that it was callous “tragedy capitalism.” The New York Post called it the “little shop of horror,” and indeed the cheese platter with hearts placed strategically where the planes came down was maybe a step over the line. Families expressed outrage about the lack of sensitivity of a number of items, with some objecting to the store more generally.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

But instead of reacting defensively, Joe Daniels, president of the memorial foundation, has announced that the museum will ask family members who sit on the board to help vet the products for sale in the store. That vetting will take place in the store so the families can view the items in context.

Officials at other memorial museums nationwide said the reaction of families was to be expected.

The cheese platter has been removed.—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: AccountabilityEquity-Centered ManagementFoundationsMarketingNonprofit NewsScandals
See comments

Call to action
You might also like
Foundations Look to New Models of International Development amid Retrenchment
Ted Siefer
Leading “Against the Current”: A Conversation with Eveline Shen
Isaiah Thompson and Eveline Shen
Coalition Challenges OpenAI’s Nonprofit Governance
Jennifer Johnson
Rethinking Nonprofit Survival: Why Partnership Is the New Leadership
Michael Anderson, Rumbidzai Mufuka and Adelaide Rohrssen
Study Finds Widespread Self-Censorship in the Philanthropic Sector
Ted Siefer
Can We All Become Nonprofit Consultants?
Michelle Flores Vryn

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, "Alison Stine: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Alison Stine
Alison Stine

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.