logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Is Doing Business with AARP a Bad Deal?

Nancy Knoche
July 28, 2011

July 24, 2011; Source: The Palm Beach Post | Seniors join AARP and receive discounts from partnering businesses eager to reach out to their 40 million members. Revenue from these agreements comprises 46 percent of its income. A recent bankruptcy filing by an AARP corporate partner reveals some of the details and financial benefits to AARP. Questions of AARP’s profit motive and tax exempt status surface again.

HearUSA, signed a $7.6 million dollar deal with AARP to be the sole hearing aid provider to its members. The company agreed to provide 1,000 aids a year to disadvantaged seniors and donate $250,000 to AARP’s education fund. It also paid AARP $660,000 royalties from sales of hearing aids. Within a year of announcing this agreement, the company president resigned and HearUSA ended up in bankruptcy court.

HearUSA apparently had a history of operating losses. The AARP contract was not the primary reason for the bankruptcy, but it didn’t help. Their major supplier was against the deal. Large numbers of hearing aids were not sold and HearUSA spent or lost a combined $3 million through the AARP contract in the 3rd quarter of 2010.
According to the article, HearUSA was reluctant to provide details of the AARP contract in bankruptcy filings. AARP, which also runs a for-profit subsidiary AARP Services, also refuses to discuss the agreement.

An earlier article in NPQ Newswire summarized a March congressional report that questions AARP’s tax exempt, non-profit status. It noted that the organization makes more than $650 million in royalties through these contracts, which are kept confidential from its membership.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Phil Kent, president of the American Seniors Association, a publicly traded company and competitor of AARP, noted that HearUSA got “ripped off.” He also questions AARP’s secrecy in these types of deals. Analysts say HearUSA had a profitable business model that was just poorly managed.

This business failure should also raise a red flag to other companies wishing to partner with AARP. Check, analyze and ask: Is it worth it? –Nancy Knoche

 

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Who’s Doing the Work? How to Shift Power and Not Just Workloads
Noah Ponton and Vijay Simhan
Black History Is Economic History: A Charge Toward Black Futures
Janelle Williams and Jessica Norwood
In the Face of Authoritarianism, Connection Is Resistance
EJ Juárez
Investing Your Values In the New Age of AI Civil Rights
Whitney Shepard
Giving Birth Under Surveillance: Migrants, ICE, and Obstetric Violence
María Constanza Costa
Power and Possibility: The Role of Donor Organizing
Rachel Sherman

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
March 19th, 2:00 pm ET

Open Board Search

How Casting a Wide Net Transforms Nonprofit Governance

Register

    
You might also like
9/11 Charities Hope to Open Hearts and Wallets
Nancy Knoche
Bloomberg Spreads the Wealth to Fellow Big-City Mayors
Nancy Knoche and Rick Cohen
The Food Stamp Program – Unsustainable or Untouchable?
Nancy Knoche

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.