logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

NIMBY Discrimination Suit Resolved Successfully

Ruth McCambridge
October 29, 2010

October 28, 2010; Source: The Metro West Daily News | The town of Framingham, Mass. has finally settled a long simmering and highly contentious lawsuit with a local social service agency. The South Middlesex Opportunity Council (SMOC) filed the suit in 2007 when the town opposed its efforts to site Sage House, a recovery center for former addicts and their families and Larry’s Place, a home for disabled veterans there. The suit charged [PDF] that Framingham town leaders and a few residents were participating in a coordinated attempt to rid Framingham of its disabled population.

SMOC claimed that the town violated federal housing laws. The settlement, reached after at least one claim of financial intimidation by the town and one previous failed attempt at mediation, requires the town’s insurance company to pay $1 million to SMOC and to provide training in anti-discrimination laws to town officials. Kudos to SMOC for pursuing this in what must have been a very difficult local political environment.

The language of observers from the article exhibits the degree to which the issue has been divisive. “We’re sorry that it had to come down to this, this far in the process,” said the Rev. J. Anthony Lloyd of the Greater Framingham Community Church. He said “lots of people are broken” because of the divisive fight over how SMOC’s nonprofit social service programs fit into the community.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Jim Cuddy of SMOC obviously sees the suit as worth the friction, saying “We embrace the agreement in which both parties acknowledge the right of every person in our community to have a place to call home,” An editorial today suggests that residents of Framingham will be left with a bad taste in the mouths because of the $1 million (which, again, will be paid by an insurance company) but it is worth noting that SMOC had offered to settle the lawsuit earlier without a financial award and was turned down by the town [PDF].

I am glad to be able to write this Newswire the day after reporting that officials in Indiana may be suggesting to parents that they “dump” their disabled children in homeless shelters.—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Nonprofit News
See comments

Call to action
You might also like
A Canary in a Coal Mine: Amazon’s Luzerne County Data Center
Carrie Santoro
Gathering for Democracy: Dispatches from Chicago
Venu Gupta
Navigating Conflict in Movement Spaces
Dean Spade
An Artist Stands Up for Jornaleros
Nina R. Salerno
Envisioning the Future of Cooperatives: A Conversation with Christina Clamp
Steve Dubb and Christina Clamp
How the Next Set of UN Sustainability Goals Can Center the Solidarity Economy
Ilcheong Yi, Christina Clamp, Michael A. Peck, Zhen Lee, Ibon Zugasti and Yukyong Jung Yun Choe

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, "Alison Stine: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Alison Stine
Alison Stine
Staff Picks for 2025: Rebekah Barber
Rebekah Barber
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.