logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

2018 Combined Federal Campaign Launched: Better Not to Count Chickens

Ruth McCambridge
September 11, 2018
By U.S. Government [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

September 10, 2018; NonProfit Times

NPQ has long reported that the federal government’s Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) is in decline, and last year’s tally of receipts did not hold many surprises.

The CFC, of course, is the workplace giving campaign for federal workers—something like the United Way—so it is not on its own in experiencing a negative trend, but it may stand alone in terms of the degree of the downturn. Last year’s total was just $101 million, compared to the previous year’s $167 million and 2009’s $283 million. This precipitous drop was not only disappointing, but it also had the unfortunate effect of driving planned costs of the campaign up proportionately to 25 percent of the tally.

However, the CFC is still playing all of this very close to the vest. As it tries to pump up its constituency for this year’s campaign, it has buried any information regarding the downturn while still touting technological fixes as the answer:

New opportunities abound with the use of new technology. What seemed impossible just a few years ago is now entirely possible and will be more commonplace five years from now.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The proliferation of this technology campaign-wide presents a rare strategic occasion for the CFC to become an even more efficient campaign in the future. The CFC Program is endeavoring to bring these advances to donors as well. For example, nonprofits are lending their expertise in web-based philanthropy to bring new efficiencies to giving in the federal workplace through the use automated giving.

Indeed, the CFC’s section on Impact and Results shows that the effort has recently eschewed any press releases on dollar results.

Year Amount News Release
2015 $177.8 million None Available
2014 $193.2 million None Available
2013 $209.7 million None Available
2012 $258.3 million None Available
2011 $272.7 million None Available
2010 $281.5 million OPM Release CFC Giving Numbers
2009 $282.6 million OPM Recognizes Charitable Giving of Federal Employees at White House Ceremony
2008 $275.9 million OPM Recognizes Charitable Giving of Federal Employees in White House Ceremony
2007 $273.1 million CFC Raises $273 Million in 2007
2006 $271.6 million CFC Rings the Register with Fourth-Consecutive, Record-Setting Charity Drive
2005 $268.5 Million CFC Receives Record Pledges Totaling $268.5 Million in 2005
2004 $256.9 Million None Available

This section does offer that “Campaign results data from 2004-2009 are available upon request.” Still, we commend the NonProfit Times for keeping on top of the results after 2015.

The Combined Federal Campaign may be a canary in the coalmine where workplace campaigns are concerned…or maybe something else ails it? In any case, it doesn’t want to talk about it.—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: FundraisingNonprofit News
See comments

You might also like
Does Personal Investment Hurt Fundraising?
Rochelle Jerry
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
If Farm School NYC Closes, What Will the City Lose?
Farm School NYC and Iris M. Crawford
Be Bold This GivingTuesday: Lessons from Public Rights Project
Jennifer Johnson
Leading “Against the Current”: A Conversation with Eveline Shen
Isaiah Thompson and Eveline Shen
GivingTuesday: Ride the Wave, Don’t Fight It
Rhea Wong

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks into a microphone in front of a sign reading "We are the Supermajority" while an audience listens.
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is...
Jennifer Gerson
A wooden bridge leading to an forested area, representing how personal investment should be a bridge, not a business model.
Does Personal Investment Hurt Fundraising?
Rochelle Jerry
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.