logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

GoFundMe-Based “We Build the Wall” Campaign Goes Rogue

Ruth McCambridge
January 14, 2019
Brian Kolfage, center, seated. (US Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Nathan Allen)

January 13, 2018; Newsweek

In the midst of a government shutdown with no end in sight, the absurd attempt to use crowdfunding site GoFundMe as an alternate means to fund the president’s efforts to build an enormous wall on the southern US border has become even more convoluted, turning into a purported DIY project. The motives of its initiator, who turns out to be a serial conservative site builder, have also come under scrutiny.

Brian Kolfage’s private attempt to raise $1 billion to put toward the wall’s costs raised only $20 million. Since GoFundMe collects money from donors regardless of whether the target has been hit, Kolfage has proposed that the money should go toward his new nonprofit, “We Build The Wall, Inc.” This, GoFundMe spokesman Bobby Whithorne says, breaks the rules.

“When the campaign was created, the campaign organizer specifically stated on the campaign page, ‘If we don’t reach our goal or come significantly close we will refund every single penny,’” Whithorne says. “He also stated on the campaign page, ‘100 percent of your donations will go to the Trump Wall. If for any reason we don’t reach our goal we will refund your donation.” However, that did not happen. This means all donors will receive a refund.

Kolfage says that former donors ought to send their refunded money to his new scheme—after all, he claims, his extensive personal research has convinced him that his team can build the wall faster and cheaper than the government could, and that he can administer the donated funds with more efficiency and alacrity.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Okay, plans can change. But NBC News suggests that money for the wall might not have been the endgame anyway; instead, the veteran now has a potentially lucrative list for fundraising and outreach to conservative causes. Kolfage claims to have gathered 3.5 million conservative email addresses through the border wall campaign alone.

According to multiple sources, including MediaMatters, Kolfage has a history of publishing far-right websites—ones Facebook eventually barred from the platform for inauthentic behavior—and starting or engaging with conservative fundraising campaigns, including one for Brett Kavanaugh that raised $600,000.

According to former employees and public records including website archives, Nevada business registrations and property records, Kolfage has repeatedly created GoFundMe campaigns and published inflammatory fake news articles, pushing them both from websites that he sought to hide behind shell companies and false identities, in part to harvest email addresses. Those addresses were then used to push people back to Kolfage’s websites, to sell a brand of coffee he owns, or to be stockpiled for future use by conservative campaigns.

In the writing of this story, I recall a forum in which state regulators were trying to predict the problems for which they would need to be on the lookout. They eventually concluded that tech-based fundraising mechanisms would come to present a whole new set of ethical and legal problems they could not fully anticipate. So it goes.—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: CrowdfundingFundraisingNonprofit NewsVeterans
See comments

Call to action
You might also like
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
If Farm School NYC Closes, What Will the City Lose?
Farm School NYC and Iris M. Crawford
Be Bold This GivingTuesday: Lessons from Public Rights Project
Jennifer Johnson
Leading “Against the Current”: A Conversation with Eveline Shen
Isaiah Thompson and Eveline Shen
GivingTuesday: Ride the Wave, Don’t Fight It
Rhea Wong
How to Handle Founder’s Syndrome with Grace
Marian Urquilla

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
A group of people standing and smiling together while holding up signs with the Giving Tuesday logo and that say, “I Give Time”
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
Participants growing garlic at the Farm School NYC. 2025.
If Farm School NYC Closes, What Will the City Lose?
Farm School NYC and Iris M. Crawford
A group of diverse people volunteering by distributing food off of a truck, representing how Nonprofits across the country are ramping up their GivingTuesday campaigns.
Be Bold This GivingTuesday: Lessons from Public Rights...
Jennifer Johnson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.