logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

IRS: Admissions Scandal Parents May Face Big Tax Levies for Faux Charitable Contributions

Ruth McCambridge
April 11, 2019

April 10, 2019; Norwalk Reflector

Yesterday, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Chuck Rettig told the US Senate Finance Committee he expects the IRS will require some of the parents involved in the college admissions scandal to correct their tax returns and pay taxes, interest, and penalties on the bribes ranging from $25,000 to $400,000 they listed as charitable contributions on their tax returns. The contributions were characterized as support for underserved kids but were used to bribe various college officials and others to facilitate their own children’s admission into prestigious universities.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Those repayments could amount to quite a bit, since the scam involved 33 parents and $25 million in bribes, with some of those bribes disguised as contributions to Key Worldwide Foundation. William Rick Singer, who was the ringleader of the scam, has cooperated with the prosecution in return for a lighter sentence. The defendants in these cases are being charged with—or have already plead guilty to—money laundering, conspiracy, and fraud.

Of the 3,000 cases addressed by the IRS’s criminal investigations unit in 2017, around 66 percent resulted in jail time. Given these parents’ elite status, any jail time in their sentences would be some stroke of bad luck.—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Nonprofit NewsPolicyScandals
See comments

Call to action
You might also like
Social Enterprise: Lessons from Down Under
Vicki Pozzebon
If Farm School NYC Closes, What Will the City Lose?
Farm School NYC and Iris M. Crawford
The New COVID Vaccine Rules Leave Parents with More Questions Than Answers
Barbara Rodriquez
The Protective Visas That May Never Come
Mel Leonor Barclay
Moving Beyond a Buzzword: Making “Resilience” Real
Laurie Mazur
Voter Registration Faces Threats Nonprofits Can’t Ignore
Lauren Girardin

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, "Alison Stine: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Alison Stine
Alison Stine

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.