logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Coordinated Funding for Nonprofits—Good or Bad?

Rick Cohen
September 29, 2010

October 1, 2010; Ann Arbor Chronicle | In Washtenaw County (Ann Arbor), Michigan, the United Way, the Community Foundation, the City of Ann Arbor, the County government, and the consortium of 11 other local governments are talking about coordinating their $5 million in funding for human services nonprofits. They have proposed a two-year pilot project to coordinate their funding around six priority issues—housing/homelessness, aging, school-aged youth, children from birth to six, health, and food.

Observers have raised a number of questions about how this coordinated funding program would work: What happens to nonprofits that used to be funded by these entities but don’t provide services in the six priority areas? Will this work to the advantage of larger, well-established nonprofits and therefore discriminate against new or small nonprofits? And how will the different organizational cultures of the United Way, the community foundations, and the governmental agencies blend together?


  SUBSCRIBE | Click Here to subscribe to THE NONPROFIT QUARTERLY for just $49 >>

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.


Each of the priority areas will have a planning group that will make recommendations about needed services, for example the Blueprint for Aging consortium would identify the needs of senior citizens and the Washtenaw Housing Alliance would identify the needs of housing and homelessness issues; other planning groups would be the Food Gatherers, the Washtenaw Alliance for Children and Youth, and Washtenaw Success by 6.

The article isn’t clear about how the funding decisions will be made after receiving the service analysis needs from the planning groups, but it appears that the Ann Arbor Office of Community Development will be playing the lead coordinating role as it currently does for the public sector funders. The director of OCD hinted that nonprofits might not be the only mechanisms used by the consortium to deliver services. “They are not the be all and end all,” she said, indicating that some services might be delivered by “partnerships.”

The Washtenaw funding consortium has more reviews to undergo before it becomes operational in July 2011. There is a long history in the community development field of funder collaboratives, mostly from the foundation and corporate side, occasionally funds from the public sector will also be included. The Ann Arbor area is talking about community development and human services, though with only two large institutional funders (the community foundation and the United Way) as opposed to the multiple private foundations and corporate funders usually involved in community development collaboratives. The Ann Arbor people are thinking that their plan might be a national model. What do you think of this?—Rick Cohen

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Rick Cohen

Rick joined NPQ in 2006, after almost eight years as the executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Before that he played various roles as a community worker and advisor to others doing community work. He also worked in government. Cohen pursued investigative and analytical articles, advocated for increased philanthropic giving and access for disenfranchised constituencies, and promoted increased philanthropic and nonprofit accountability.

More about: Philanthropy
See comments

You might also like
For Every $100 Foundations Give, Only 19 Cents Go to Volunteer Support
Jan Masaoka
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
Blocking Authoritarianism: Steps Nonprofits and Foundations Must Take
Saqib Bhatti
The Power of Direct Community Funding
Ana Valéria Araújo
Equitable Intermediaries: Power, Protection, Partnership
Frank Gargione and Andrea Granda
GivingTuesday: Mobilizing Grassroots Donors
Isaiah Thompson

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
a dime, representing small amount of money that are dedicated to volunteers for every $100 donated.
For Every $100 Foundations Give, Only 19 Cents Go to...
Jan Masaoka
A group of people standing and smiling together while holding up signs with the Giving Tuesday logo and that say, “I Give Time”
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
In 2013, I was working with local Detroit organizers to protect essential community services during the city’s bankruptcy. When we sat down with the organizers, one of my mentors asked them, “Who are the people that can pick up the phone, call the governor, and know that, nine times out of ten, he will do whatever they ask?” A man in the background controlling strings attached to a pair of hands in the foreground, symbolizing the puppet-like control that billionaires have over President Trump.
Blocking Authoritarianism: Steps Nonprofits and Foundations...
Saqib Bhatti

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.