logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Foundation Sacred Cow Challenged in Nonprofit Quarterly Article

The Editors
December 9, 2008

“The doctrine of perpetuity insulates foundations from maximizing the value of their assets for society,” argues Arthur “Buzz” Schmidt in an article released today by the Nonprofit Quarterly. The founder of GuideStar USA and founder and CEO of Guidestar International, Schmidt writes in, “Escaping the Perpetuity Mindset Trap” that this moment in history and the economy makes the role of foundations more important than ever, and it should be in the form of substantially increased payout arates and other strategies—even to the point of foundations considering ‘spending down’ their assets.”

Most of the more than 80,000 U.S. private foundations are required by the federal government to pay out a minimum of 5 percent of their assets yearly including grants and administrative expenses with the exception of community foundation and other “public foundations” that have no payout requirement. Yet most private foundations use that 5 percent floor as a ceiling amassing billions in assets like any privately held corporation. Holding on to what is essentially public money in this way ultimately “erodes the real value of society’s philanthropic assets,” according to Schmidt.

Arguing they must retain funds for rainy days, foundations have adamantly opposed increases in payout requirements and believe it’s more necessary to assure their future existence than to give larger sums to solve social problems right now. Schmidt disagrees with this stance as shortsighted and says, “Minimizing the resources that are devoted to solving today’s problems is hardly a prescription for a sustainable future.”

A successful lobbying effort on the part of the nation’s largest private foundations, defeated the Charitable Giving Act of 2003 that would have required foundations pay out a minimum of 5 percent of their assets in grants, in effect raising the mandatory payout rate by a small amount.  Schmidt’s argument questions the precepts of most specific private foundations that going above a 5 percent payout would threaten the value of foundations by undoing foundation perpetuity.  He argues that foundations should not continue to think of the 5 percent payout rate or the notion of foundation perpetuity as sacred cows. 

“Now more than ever in our lifetime,” Schmidt writes, “we face conditions-economic, environmental and human-that require foundations to maximize the value of their resources for society. They must become every bit as creative and resourceful and accountable as the organizations they support. It is only when foundations escape the perpetuity mindtrap that we will see their full potential to contribute to a sustainable future.”

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

In his article, among other strategies, Schmidt prescribes a social value maximization approach that might require all foundations to pay out all of their assets in grants over a prescribed  period of time. This period could potentially conform the purpose and mission of the foundation rather than to the overriding notion of institutional immortality.

In addition to his roles with Guidestar and Guidestar International, Schmidt is also a trustee of the Institute for Philanthropy (London), the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, and the FB Heron Foundation, which he chairs.  In 1999, he was recognized as Nonprofit Executive of the Year by the Nonprofit Times. Nationally and internationally, Schmidt is recognized as one of the most significant thinkers on maximizing the impact of foundations and nonprofits for societal betterment.   

 

The Nonprofit Quarterly is the premier management journal of the nonprofit sector, providing print and online resources about management, governance and policy to the nation’s nonprofits and philanthropy.

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Trump Lawsuits Seek to Muzzle Media, Posing Serious Threat to Free Press
Kathy Kiely and Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
For Every $100 Foundations Give, Only 19 Cents Go to Volunteer Support
Jan Masaoka
Foundations Look to New Models of International Development amid Retrenchment
Ted Siefer
Journalism Is a Catalyst for Change—and a Critical Investment
Rhett Ayers Butler
Are We Ready to Share Power?
Karla Monterroso
Reckoning with the History of Asian Diasporic Community Media
Christine X. Phan, Sarah Nguyễn and Rachel Kuo

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
A graphite drawing of people with their mouths sewn shut with red thread.
Trump Lawsuits Seek to Muzzle Media, Posing Serious Threat...
Kathy Kiely and Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks into a microphone in front of a sign reading "We are the Supermajority" while an audience listens.
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is...
Jennifer Gerson
a dime, representing small amount of money that are dedicated to volunteers for every $100 donated.
For Every $100 Foundations Give, Only 19 Cents Go to...
Jan Masaoka

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.