logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Transparency Threatened by High Public Disclosure Costs

Bruce S Trachtenberg
October 27, 2010

October 25, 2010; Source: New Mexico Independent |Wikileaks’ recent publication of the latest trove of material revealing what only a few people really know about the wars being fought in Afghanistan and Iraq shows how difficult it is for governments to keep secret documents from public view. Yet as this story illustrates, in an era when classified reports can make their way to web for the entire world to see, governments can still find ways to thwart or slow the release documents that the public has a right to see and distribute on demand.

According to the New Mexico Independent, a watchdog nonprofit says it is hearing more complaints about “excessive” charges to make electronic copies of public records. These fees violate the state public records law, says Sarah Welsh, executive director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government (FOG). She adds, “These include big bills to receive routine documents as e-mail attachments, and big bills for the privilege of making your own copies with a scanner or digital camera. Whatever the situation, unreasonable copy fees violate open-government laws and strongly discourage public access to information.”

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

New Mexico law allows individuals to inspect public documents for free. However, government agencies are also permitted to charge modest fees—but no more than $1 per page—when someone requests copies. However, the newspaper reports that in many cases fees, “arbitrarily exceed the actual cost of producing those copies.” Some even go as far as levying per-page charges for documents already in electronic form and that can be easily transferred by e-mail at no cost. Welsh says excessive fees represent the “final barrier to access” to people like herself who need to be able to examine public documents to make sure government actions are in the public’s interest.—Bruce Trachtenberg

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
S.O.S.—Nonprofits Need Funding for “Staff Operating Support”
Rusty Stahl
Environmental Advocates Confront Trump’s Fossil Fuel Agenda
María Constanza Costa
Not One Drop: How an Arizona Community Came Together to Fight a Data Center
Maria Renée
Why It Matters that Renee Nicole Macklin Good Was a Poet
Alison Stine
For Movements to Win, Organize People and Money
Farhad Ebrahimi
The Danger ICE Poses to the Disabled Community
Alison Stine

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks into a microphone in front of a sign reading "We are the Supermajority" while an audience listens.
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is...
Jennifer Gerson
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.