logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

A Suggestion for Jeff Bezos’s Long-Awaited Funding Initiative: Do No Harm

Jon Pratt
August 13, 2018
Picture of Jeff Bezos used in an article about Nonprofit Funding Initiative
“Jeff Bezos painted portrait.” Photo credit: thierry ehrmann

Jeff Bezos, the world’s first centi-billionaire, opened the door to suggestions for how he might make contributions for the betterment of humankind. His most visible large commitment to date has been $33 million for TheDream.us, which provides competitive college scholarships and data monitoring to support undocumented immigrant youth, but what else could he do?

In response to a query from the New York Times last year about his philanthropic plans, Bezos welcomed suggestions that would have immediate, practical results. This seems to rule out creating philanthropic warehouses/endowments for private foundations/universities/fine arts, and presumably would not include Neil Young’s proposal for “silver spaceships flying to a new home in the sun,” despite Bezos’s expertise in his Blue Origin project.

Nonetheless, one can imagine several fruitful avenues open to make the world a better place, from which several possible themes emerge:

  • Intervene against a thousand inequities and indignities to neutralize some of the vulture businesses and technologies that make life worse for already suffering people
    • Payday lenders
    • Student loan enforcers
    • Bail bondsmen
    • Prison vendors
    • Low-income-housing-tenant evictors
    • Big Pharma opioid hawkers
    • Assault weapon publicists
    • Motivational speakers
    • Wellness spa shills
  • Reduce refugee flows/mass casualties via post-conflict civil society stabilization
    • Former dictator fellowships, encouraging timely exit strategies
    • Former dictator island & wellness spa, ditto
    • School and road construction employing former soldiers
    • STEM-free teacher training using whole-brain (and no-screen) learning
  • Reverse catastrophic climate change
    • Solar and wind energy enlargement
    • Cardboard box recycling drones
  • Expand worldwide internet access
    • Accessible hotspots in not-so-hot spots
    • E-commerce use-tax-supported screen-time addiction counseling
    • Civil discourse repair program
  • Seattle and San Francisco gentrification/urban degradation reparations (substituting for funds lost from the reversal of Seattle’s social progress ordinance that would have required payments from tech oligarchs)
    • Humanitarian housing for homeless people

While each reform proposal (and more besides these) is laudable and potentially beneficial in some way, there is still the overlord problem. Inexorably, the ultra-high-net-worth citizen’s suggestions become commands by making the table, setting the agenda, and using up the civic oxygen of tens of millions of plain citizens (let alone non-citizens). Want to create incentives for boy’s choirs? Within a year, you could give birth to 100,000 boy’s choirs eagerly responding to your RFP.

Amazon is a celebrated innovation success: faster, cheaper, a market dominator employing over a half-million warehouse workers, drivers, and others, exploding into an e-commerce supernova (and accidentally displacing thousands of other businesses and stand up retail locations and jobs all over the world). Even if you wanted to be perfectly benevolent, what if your every good deed inescapably contained an adverse consequence—that giving away $100 billion causes untold misery somewhere to untold others?

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

If you are the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and you put tens of millions into persuading public schools to restructure into smaller-sized schools to improve student performance, and later decide it actually doesn’t matter, does it matter? Interestingly, to the American Federation of Teachers, it did matter; when teachers questioned the loyalty of their national organization as overly responsive to Gates Foundation preferences, the AFT decided to quit taking the Gates’s money to save their credibility.

Intentions are good, but individual results vary. Regrettable cases of detrimental reliance, where communities change their position to their disadvantage in response to philanthropic incentives, bring to mind an oddly instructive story from Ivan Turgenev’s 1862 novel Fathers and Sons. Turgenev’s medical student Arkady was concerned that a local nobleman had dived enthusiastically into the role of operating surgeon for injured serfs on his rustic estate—despite his utter lack of medical knowledge or training—with dreadful results.

Indeed, there are no doctors here at all. There’s one of the neighbors here, a retired major, only fancy, he doctors the people too. I asked the question, “Has he studied medicine?” And they told me, “No, he’s not studied; he does it more from philanthropy.”

…Ha! ha! ha! from philanthropy!

Oh, the good (and the ill!) that $100 billion could do! The world around us is changing, with no prime directive not to change it. Is there a touchless car wash available to Jeff Bezos, a way a super-mega-donor can alter the orbit of the earth to beneficial effect with no public notice, permanent scratches, or opportunity hoarding? This is the undiscovered territory—to use a grand resource to support small and local general benefit, skipping credit or agenda, not telling people what to think or having them model the future after you. That would be a wonder of the modern world.

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Jon Pratt

Jon Pratt is the former executive director of the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits, an association of 2,000 organizations that sponsors research, training, lobbying and negotiated discounts to strengthen Minnesota's nonprofit sector that he directed from 1987 until 2021. He is also codirector of GrantAdvisor.org, and a contributing editor to the Nonprofit Quarterly.

More about: Philanthropy
See comments

You might also like
S.O.S.—Nonprofits Need Funding for “Staff Operating Support”
Rusty Stahl
For Movements to Win, Organize People and Money
Farhad Ebrahimi
Blue-State Pensions Are Subsidizing the Billionaire Takeover: This Must Stop!
Sara Myklebust and Aditi Sen
For Every $100 Foundations Give, Only 19 Cents Go to Volunteer Support
Jan Masaoka
Making Sense of GivingTuesday 2025
Isaiah Thompson
Blocking Authoritarianism: Steps Nonprofits and Foundations Must Take
Saqib Bhatti

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
S.O.S.—Nonprofits Need Funding for “Staff Operating...
Rusty Stahl
A floating ball of dollar bills, symbolizing the organization and control of money.
For Movements to Win, Organize People and Money
Farhad Ebrahimi
A pair of pliers cutting a blue wire, symbolizing cutting off blue-state funding sources for Trump.
Blue-State Pensions Are Subsidizing the Billionaire...
Sara Myklebust and Aditi Sen

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.