Houston County, TX, December 11, 1886. Sixteen Black men gathered on a farm and started something that would grow into one of the most ambitious economic organizing efforts in US history. They called it the Colored Farmers’ National Alliance and Cooperative Union (CFNACU). Within five years, it had spread across the South and claimed 1.2 million members. Then, in 1891, it was violently destroyed.
Most Americans have never heard of it. That is exactly the problem.
Jessica Gordon Nembhard, a political economist and scholar of Black cooperative economics, described this endeavor in an interview with NPQ as: “A mutual aid society, a labor union, a cooperative development enterprise and a political party… I think the fact that the CFNACU combined so many interests and issues explains why it was probably the largest Black organization in US history.”
Active in southern states, including Arkansas, western Tennessee, and Alabama, the organization was made up Black workers who realized that the economic structure of the country had been rigged against them, condemning them to remain landless and poor, so they decided to create their own economy.
“It was an organization of 1.2 million African Americans who realized that if the economic structure of the country had been rigged against them to make sure they remained landless and poor, then they would have to create their own economy.”
They established cooperative purchasing groups so that its members could buy their supplies without being price-gouged by White-owned stores. They developed coordinated marketing efforts so that they could sell their cotton at a higher price. They ran their own newspapers and schools. They demanded economic reform, especially banking reform, land reform, and labor reforms. They formed their own credit unions and cooperative cotton gins and mills. And they did all of this under the reign of terror established in the post-Reconstruction South.
CFNACU’s founding structure tells us everything about the environment it was operating in. Omar H. Ali, author of In the Lion’s Mouth: Black Populism in the New South, 1886–1900, the definitive study of this movement, explains the central strategic decision the founders made: “They decided to have Richard Humphrey, who is a white cotton farmer, be their leader… in order to really speak to larger groups of people that were not Black, you really needed to have a white person because the racism was so intense. And so they did that as a strategic decision.”
Humphrey, a White Baptist minister and former Confederate soldier, served as the organization’s general superintendent and public spokesman—able to testify before the US Senate in rooms where Black men were not permitted to enter. The Black founders of the CFNACU put a White face on the organization not out of deference but out of calculation. They understood the architecture of the system they were operating in and worked around it as much as they could.
The CFNACU expanded at a faster pace than almost any other organization in the South after the Civil War. They forged uneasy alliances with some White populists, such as the Southern Farmers’ Alliance, to challenge the power of large concentrations of wealth and the debt-based crop lien system, which affected both White and Black farmers.
Then 1891 arrived.
A cotton pickers’ strike was organized by the CFNACU to demand a wage rise from 50 cents to $1 per hundred pounds of cotton harvested. The strike was planned simultaneously throughout the South. Yet little strike activity occurred outside of some localized areas, as the CFNACU lacked the organizational means to mobilize its illiterate and landless sharecropping members. The organization’s White populist members, landowners mostly, actively opposed the strike.
Sign up for our free newsletters
Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.
In Lee County, Arkansas, a group of cotton pickers was met with brutal repression. At least fifteen Black lives were lost in the attacks; nine were taken from police custody and lynched. Ali does not let the scale of that response be misread: “Just the act of Black people coming together was a political act given the larger environment. And so, Black people coming together to show their force was extremely provocative to the white supremacists, but a very courageous thing that the African American leaders were doing. They built a sense of solidarity and movement which was powerful.”
The violence in Lee County was not a response to a massive uprising. It was a response to the existence of organized Black economic power. The terror was the message—and it worked. The CFNACU would collapse by the end of 1891 and set the stage for segregation laws and lynching as an accepted method of control.
“The violence in Lee County was not a response to a massive uprising. It was a response to the existence of organized Black economic power. The terror was the message—and it worked.”
But the forces that destroyed the CFNACU Alliance did not stop at violence. Robin D. Muhammad, whose research covers Black labor history and the CFNACU’s organizing methods, names the system that did the longer-term damage in an interview with NPQ: “The convict-lease system, for example, threatened fundamentally Black property and labor rights disproportionately, creating what I call a farm-to-chain-gang pipeline that siphoned off Black leadership and participation in agrarian reform.”
The organization’s Black leaders were arrested on pretextual charges and those convicted, were leased to plantations as forced labor. The pipeline ran both ways: it removed organizers from communities and returned broken men, or none at all. The CFNACU was not just beaten. It was systematically dismantled at every level, from the local chapter to the national leadership.
For nonprofit workers, cooperative organizers, community land trust leaders, and rural justice networks in 2026, the story of the CFNACU is not a story of failure. It is a masterclass in what economic justice organizing looks like when it is working well enough to threaten the people with the most to lose.
Several important lessons emerge:
- Build layered institutions, not single strategies. The CFNACU’s purchasing networks, credit unions, press, and political mobilization provided multiple lines of defense. When one line came under attack, another could still be counted on, at least temporarily. The most successful cooperatives of today follow a similar approach, linking housing, food, and credit cooperatives with worker-owned firms to ensure that a weakness in any one area cannot undermine the whole system.
- Keep the coalition together from the beginning. Because of the inherent power imbalance between White and Black members of the CFNACU, the multiracial alliances could not withstand economic stress. White members were landowners. Black members were sharecroppers and laborers. This ensured that the two sides would find themselves completely opposed during the strike. Cross-racial coalitions today that do not reckon honestly with differences in power and economic stake will face the same fracture.
- Know that success makes you a target. The CFNACU was suppressed because it was working. Gordon Nembhard’s research documents the specific tactics: discrediting leaders with false accusations, burning cooperative buildings, passing laws to separate Black and White cooperative members, refusing loans, and blocking rail transport of produce. Effective organizations need legal defense infrastructure, community security plans, and financial reserves before confrontation arrives, not after.
Ali, who has spent his career recovering these buried histories, offers the frame that matters most for carrying this work forward: “There have been many movements in world history that we don’t know about because they failed in the immediate sense. But what they were arguing for and what they were pushing for would become standards.”
The CFNACU demanded farmer subsidies. It demanded direct election of senators. It demanded that Black communities have full civil and political rights. Every one of those demands eventually became law or policy—decades later, through other movements, after enormous additional suffering. Although the CFNACU did not live to see any of it, its descendants did. It planted the seeds needed for their social and economic rise. One clear example was the founding of the NAACP in 1909, which went on to successfully lobby for federal anti-lynching legislation.
In 2026, as the United States marks 250 years of its founding promises, the CFNACU deserves to be part of that reckoning. Not as a cautionary tale about what happens when Black organizing gets too ambitious. Instead, as evidence of what becomes possible when people with nothing but collective will decide to build cooperative power from the ground up.
The strike was crushed. The vision was not. Every farmer cooperative, every community land trust, every rural justice network operating today is, knowingly or not, continuing the work the CFNACU began in Houston County on a cold December day in 1886.
The keys they left behind still fit the doors we need to open.
