logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Nonprofit Newswire | Fox Parent’s Donation Causes Stir

Rick Cohen
August 19, 2010

August 17, 2010; Source: Politico | In a typically balanced report on the surprising $1 million contribution by Rupert Murdoch’s New Corp. to the Republican Governors Association, Politico points out that the political contributions of the firm that owns both Fox News and the Wall Street Journal (and Twentieth Century Fox and HarperCollins) are usually a little more balanced.

The News Corp. made it clear that the donation to the RGA is because of RGA’s pro-business agenda (including issues regarding cable TV regulation), though in the past, both News Corp. and Murdoch (and many News Corp. employees) have supported both political parties and candidates including Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid, although Fox News has long pummeled Clinton and Reid in its coverage. What distinguishes this contribution is its size, dwarfing the numbers that Politico came up with on past contributions by Disney, Time Warner, CBS, and until now the News Corp. itself.

We’re always interested to ask how corporations’ political contributions compare with their charitable activities. At News Corp., the corporate contributions are a little hard to track. The Foundation Directory Online reveals a 2010 grant of $250,000 split between the American Red Cross and the Salvation Army for Haiti earthquake relief. We also found a 2005 press release pledging $1 million to the Sallies for Hurricane Katrina relief and up to another $1 million to match donations from News Corp. employees.

The firm’s high profile charitable activity is “Idol Gives Back,” which raised $45 million for charities including the Children’s Health Fund, Feeding America, Malaria No More, Save the Children’s U.S. Programs and the United Nations Foundation with “special appearances” by the President and First Lady and Bill and Melinda Gates (the Gates Foundation was the event’s official “not-for-profit partner”).

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Murdoch and his family are billionaires several times over, their personal contributions are private, but they do have a family foundation—the Murdoch Foundation—which is capitalized by contributions from various family trusts. Despite unimaginable wealth (the Murdoch Family Trust owned 363 million shares of News Corp. stock as of last year’s proxy statement in August 2009 and Murdoch himself owned another 339 million shares, [PDF], the Foundation is a small giver, usually giving only a handful of grants in the years that it decides to give.

Its most consistent grant recipient is the Harvard Lampoon (son James is on the Lampoon board)—$50,000 a year from 2006 to 2008 though $75,000 in 2005. Someone in the foundation likes the environment, as the Nature Conservancy received $150,000 during that period. But its RGA-sized grants go to religion and education: $996,500 in 2007 and $920,000 in 2006 to Americans for Oxford, $500,000 in 2007 to the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels (in Los Angeles), $191,500 in 2006 to the venerable National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (in London), and a whopping $3,330,000 to the Weill Medical College of Cornell University in 2005.

Is there a connection between the political donation to the RGA, the corporate donations for disaster relief, and the Murdoch Foundation’s grants to churches and universities? Add in Murdoch’s fundraiser for then-senator Hillary Clinton, and you have a picture of a corporate tycoon who uses all of his resources to fulfill his personal agendas, with little concern about ideology or appearance.

There’s no debate about Murdoch’s conservative politics, but his political and philanthropic giving may be, in Politico’s words, “more concerned with making money than influencing political outcomes,” as shocking as that might be about the man who gave cable television Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity.—Rick Cohen

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Rick Cohen

Rick joined NPQ in 2006, after almost eight years as the executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Before that he played various roles as a community worker and advisor to others doing community work. He also worked in government. Cohen pursued investigative and analytical articles, advocated for increased philanthropic giving and access for disenfranchised constituencies, and promoted increased philanthropic and nonprofit accountability.

More about: Nonprofit News
See comments

You might also like
Trump Lawsuits Seek to Muzzle Media, Posing Serious Threat to Free Press
Kathy Kiely and Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is Shutting Down
Jennifer Gerson
Nonprofits Devise Creative Solutions to Address Federal Funding Cuts
Vicki Pozzebon
Does Personal Investment Hurt Fundraising?
Rochelle Jerry
Beyond the Plantation Economy: How Alabama Can Benefit from Cooperatives
Andre Carter
Women’s Rights Under Siege—but We’ve Come Too Far to Go Back
Ann Lehman

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks into a microphone in front of a sign reading "We are the Supermajority" while an audience listens.
Supermajority, Group Organizing Women Around Politics, Is...
Jennifer Gerson
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.