logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Another Silicon Valley Incursion into the Schools, Another Parent Protest

Skip Lockwood
April 26, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
MaxPixel. Creative Commons 0.

April 21, 2019; New York Times

With little data to demonstrate the effectiveness of an online learning system, the Kansas Department of Education selected two rural school systems as pilots for the Summit Learning platform. It’s not going well.

Summit is one of the more recent educational reform experiments to be backed by a billionaire and resisted by public school parents, who are often seen as recalcitrant blockades to bright ideas from on high. Mark Zuckerberg began to support Summit in 2014, devoting five Facebook engineers to the project, and since 2016, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative has committed just under $100 million to the project.

In Kansas, where schools are struggling under Republican tax and education policies, implementing state-of-the-art, web-based, student-directed, student-paced curriculum seemed to be precisely what the towns of Wellington and McPherson needed to raise their test scores and improve their schools.

Proponents of the Summit Learning system argue it offers students more control over the content, as they can determine the speed at which they learn and when they feel comfortable taking tests. Teachers using the system do not have to administer or grade quizzes and tests, leaving them more time for personal interaction with students. The Summit Learning software provides teachers with a broad range of data about student performance, and the curriculum is continually updated.

The realities of web-centric learning appeared shortly after the program’s implementation. As Nellie Bowles’s article in the New York Times notes, “Students started coming home with headaches and hand cramps. Some said they felt more anxious…another asked to bring her dad’s hunting earmuffs to class to block out classmates because work was now done largely alone.”

Web-based learning forces children to spend hours a day on computers, a requirement that dramatically exceeds the American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines (AAP) for Electronics for School-Age Children. Obesity and sleep disturbances are the most benign of the potential problems children with too much screen-time face, according to the AAP. And screen-time’s not the only issue that concerns parents. The software collects a large amount of personal student data, building an electronic file for the duration of the student’s participation in the program. Many parents are worried that the privacy language contains too many loopholes that might eventually allow the data to be sold or misused. Privacy concerns were a primary driver for schools in Cheshire, Connecticut, to suspend the program in 2017. (We expressed our concerns about Summit back in 2016.)

In fact, Bowles writes, the program has been invited to leave more than one community:

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The resistance in Kansas is part of mounting nationwide opposition to Summit, which began trials of its system in public schools four years ago and is now in around 380 schools and used by 74,000 students. In Brooklyn, high school students walked out in November after their school started using Summit’s platform. In Indiana, Pennsylvania, after a survey by Indiana University of Pennsylvania found 70 percent of students wanted Summit dropped or made optional, the school board scaled it back and then voted this month to terminate it. And in Cheshire, Connecticut, the program was cut after protests in 2017.

Summit’s CEO, Diane Tavenner, started developing the software in use by the company in a series of charter schools she founded starting in 2003. Her view is that the resistance is fueled by nostalgia. “There’s people who don’t want change. They like the schools the way they are,” she says. “The same people who don’t like Summit have been the sort of vocal opposition to change throughout the process.”

But the truth is that, once again, the communities in Kansas resisting this change may not want to have their children be harmed by a process which is unproven.

Summit chose not to be part of a study after paying the Harvard Center for Education Policy Research to design one in 2016. Tom Kane, the Harvard professor preparing that assessment, said he was wary of speaking out against Summit because many education projects receive funding from Mr. Zuckerberg and Dr. Chan’s philanthropic organization, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

What’s more, the curriculum itself has come under fire because it links to items some parents find questionable. One Kansas father was displeased to find that a unit on Roman history linked to a website a few clicks away from sexually explicit art. Parents in Kentucky objected to the presentation of content about Islam as contrasted with that on Christianity. States like Kentucky have school district-based curriculum assessment where the public, teachers, and administrators review and approve materials, and many parents are not interested in having that power curtailed by someone “on the web.”

John Pane of the RAND Corporation studies personalized learning and the use of digital tools. He believes electronic teaching is in its infancy and “there has not been enough research.” Apparently some parents in Kansas would agree.—Skip Lockwood

Corrections: This article has been altered from its initial form due to new and updated information. The student whose seizures increased as a response to increased web-based screen-time was not using the Summit platform. 

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Skip Lockwood

Skip has more than 20 years of experience building and managing effective and efficient nonprofit organizations as well as five years as an executive at a for-profit company and six years as an independent political consultant. His proudest achievement was transforming a nearly bankrupt cancer nonprofit into an award-winning, multi-million dollar organization that helped to save lives. Currently, he owns and operates QL3 Strategies to provide nonprofits with the technical, ethical, strategic, and operational expertise they need to fulfill their missions.

More about: education reform public schoolsNonprofit Newsonline educationPractice

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Fisheries and Stewardship: Lessons from Native Hawaiian Aquaculture
Brenda Asuncion, Miwa Tamanaha, Kevin K.J. Chang and Kim Moa
Going Pro-Black
Cyndi Suarez
“We Thrive: Health for Justice, Justice for Health”
Nonprofit Quarterly
Winter 2021 Digital Issue
Nonprofit Quarterly
NPQ Staff Picks: Danielle Coates-Connor and Cyndi Suarez
Danielle Coates-Connor and Cyndi Suarez
NPQ Staff Picks: Joel Toner
Joel Toner

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Fisheries and Stewardship: Lessons from Native Hawaiian...
Brenda Asuncion, Miwa Tamanaha, Kevin K.J. Chang and Kim Moa
Going Pro-Black
Cyndi Suarez
“We Thrive: Health for Justice, Justice for...
Nonprofit Quarterly

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.