Earlier in August, on the anniversary of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the Black Women’s Roundtable released new polling that would not surprise anyone who studied the long history of Black women’s political organizing. Nearly seven in 10 Black women say they will definitely vote in this fall’s midterms, and 70 percent believe their vote can create change—a number up sharply from two years ago, even as trust in Washington itself continues to erode.
That combination, deep skepticism of political institutions paired with an unwavering commitment to civic participation, is not new. It is, in many ways, the through line of Black women’s political history in the United States: when the ballot box has failed them, they have built organizations to do the work instead.
That story rarely gets told with the ballot box removed from the center of the frame, and it rarely gets told as an institutional story at all. But for most of American history, the vote was either legally denied to Black women or rendered meaningless by violence, poll taxes, and literacy tests.
What filled that vacuum was not a handful of charismatic leaders, but standing organizations. These were the federations of local clubs, coordinating councils, and membership associations that Black women built, funded, staffed, and governed themselves. And its these organizations, not any single figure within them, that are the reason this history has a through line at all. Several of them are still operating, in recognizable form, more than a century later.
When the ballot box has failed them, they have built organizations to do the work instead.
A Federation Built to Last: The National Association of Colored Women
In July 1896, three existing organizations, the National Federation of Afro-American Women, the Woman’s Era Club of Boston, and the Colored Women’s League of Washington, merged to form the National Association of Colored Women, adopting the motto “Lifting As We Climb.” The choice to merge rather than compete mattered: it created a single national federation capable of chartering local clubs anywhere in the country and coordinating their work under one umbrella, while leaving each club to run its own programs locally.
That structure is what let the organization scale. Membership grew from about 5,000 in 1897 to roughly 100,000 by 1924, spread across hundreds of local and state federations. Locally, clubs ran the kind of direct-service infrastructure Black communities were denied elsewhere: kindergartens, orphanages, homes for the elderly, and vocational schools. Nationally, the association ran a coordinated scholarship fund starting in 1912, campaigned against lynching and segregated transportation, and mobilized its chapters to raise more than $5 million in war bonds during World War I.
During the Great Depression, state and local federations delivered relief and job assistance while the national body endorsed New Deal programs and pressed the federal government on child welfare policy. It was, in effect, a distributed nonprofit network decades before that language existed, one that let a small national staff leverage thousands of volunteer-run local chapters to deliver both services and advocacy at the same time.
Building the “Central Wheel”: The National Council of Negro Women
By 1935, organizers recognized a different structural problem: the country now had dozens of Black women’s organizations, each capable but working in isolation. That December, delegates from 14 national organizations convened in New York to form the National Council of Negro Women (NCNW) as a coordinating body, what its founding materials described as the “central wheel” connecting the many spokes of religious, educational, fraternal, and civic groups already doing the work.
The council’s core innovation was coalition infrastructure. Rather than running programs of its own from scratch, NCNW built the connective tissue that let dozens of independent organizations act with one voice. They shared publications like The Aframerican Woman’s Journal and the Telefact newsletter that circulated policy positions and organizing know-how across affiliate groups. In 1942, a formal national office and headquarters, that gave the coalition a permanent institutional home. They also established periodic national mobilization campaigns, including a mid-1960s voter-registration project that aimed to add two million Black voters to the rolls. In 1964, the council also , sending integrated teams of organizationally affiliated women into the state to build cross-racial support for embattled Black communities during Freedom Summer.
Today, NCNW describes itself as an “organization of organizations,” linking roughly 300 community- and campus-based sections and more than 30 national affiliate groups a structure inherited almost intact from 1935.
Turning a Campaign into an Institution: Black Women Organized for Political Action
The first two organizations show how durable civic power can be built through federated chapters and coalition structures. Black Women Organized for Political Action (BWOPA) offers a different route: turning the temporary infrastructure of an election campaign into a permanent political organization. In 1968, 12 Bay Area women organized as Bay Area Women for Dellums to elect Ron Dellums to Congress. They raised $75,000 and grew to more than 200 members before their candidate won, at which point, rather than disbanding, they reorganized as BWOPA and kept working.
Sign up for our free newsletters
Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.
Legal victories are fragile, and civic power needs a permanent institutional home independent of any single election cycle.
The organization’s early governance reflected a deliberate choice about how power should be distributed: founding members governed collectively as co-chairs for its first two years before centralizing leadership in 1970 as the group grew.
Nowadays, BWOPA operates as a statewide 501(c)(4) advocacy and membership organization with chapters across California, from Oakland and San Francisco to Sacramento, Fresno, and the Inland Empire, each running its own local programming under a shared statewide platform. The organization built a formal leadership pipeline through its Training Institute for Leadership, and it channels ongoing policy work—on reparations, economic security, and criminal justice—through standing committees like its Reparations Now Task Force. What began as ad hoc campaign labor became, deliberately, standing organizational capacity.
An Infrastructure That Outlasted Every Election Cycle
None of this organizing disappeared once the Voting Rights Act passed in 1965. If anything, the infrastructure deepened, because these organizations understood something that has held true ever since: legal victories are fragile, and civic power needs a permanent institutional home independent of any single election cycle.
The nine historically Black sororities and fraternities of the Divine Nine built voter-registration drives, literacy campaigns, and public-health outreach into their standing programming, work that continues today through initiatives like the National Pan-Hellenic Council’s ongoing voter-mobilization partnerships. And the lineage running from NACW through NCNW and BWOPA now feeds into national coalition structures like the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, marking 50 years of organizing, which anchors its work through the Black Women’s Roundtable, a network that convenes hundreds of local leaders annually and has published an annual poll tracking Black women’s political attitudes since 2017.
In Virginia this year, Roundtable-affiliated organizers helped lead a grassroots campaign that produced what advocates describe as the most racially equitable state legislative maps in the state’s history, a reminder that redistricting fights, not just Election Day turnout, are now central terrain for this kind of organizing.
The pattern is a familiar one to anyone who has traced this history back to 1896: expansions of democratic access are met with new efforts to narrow them, and Black women’s organizations have responded, generation after generation, not by waiting for the law to catch up, but by building the institutions to do the work themselves.
Why This Belongs in the America250 Story
This year, the country is in the middle of America250, the congressionally-chartered commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Organizers have described its goal as leaving “lasting civic infrastructure for future generations” and honoring the contributions of communities whose role in building American democracy has often gone unrecognized. Measured against that standard, the organizations profiled here are not a footnote to the semiquincentennial story, they are a working example of it.
NACW, NCNW, and BWOPA are, among other things, a 130-year case study in how to build nonprofit civic infrastructure that survives changes in law, leadership, and political climate, because it was built as infrastructure in the first place: federated chapter structures, coalition-coordinating bodies, formal leadership pipelines, standing committees, and permanent institutional homes, not single-campaign operations that fold once the votes are counted.
The approach these organizations developed is being tested again now. This year’s Black Women’s Roundtable polling found Black women entering the midterm cycle financially squeezed, distrustful of both parties, and worried about renewed efforts to restrict voting access, including a federal proposal that would impose new photo-identification and documentation requirements that voting-rights advocates warn could disproportionately burden Black and low-income voters. The pattern is a familiar one to anyone who has traced this history back to 1896: expansions of democratic access are met with new efforts to narrow them, and Black women’s organizations have responded, generation after generation, not by waiting for the law to catch up, but by building the institutions to do the work themselves.
As the country marks its 250th year and heads toward another consequential midterm election, that infrastructure, decades in the making, and rarely funded or covered with the seriousness it deserves, is likely to matter as much as anything happening at the ballot box itself.
